186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10669125)
1. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and correlation of clinical to Gram stain diagnostic criteria in low risk pregnant women.
Gratacós E; Figueras F; Barranco M; Ros R; Andreu A; Alonso PL; Cararach V
Eur J Epidemiol; 1999 Nov; 15(10):913-6. PubMed ID: 10669125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of the vaginal gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
Schwebke JR; Hillier SL; Sobel JD; McGregor JA; Sweet RL
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 88(4 Pt 1):573-6. PubMed ID: 8841221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in cases of abnormal vaginal discharge: comparison of clinical and microbiological criteria.
Modak T; Arora P; Agnes C; Ray R; Goswami S; Ghosh P; Das NK
J Infect Dev Ctries; 2011 May; 5(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 21628811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Evaluation of Nugent and Amsel criteria for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis].
Navarrete P; Domínguez M; Castro E; Zemelman R
Rev Med Chil; 2000 Jul; 128(7):767-71. PubMed ID: 11050838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gram stain method shows better sensitivity than clinical criteria for detection of bacterial vaginosis in surveillance of pregnant, low-income women in a clinical setting.
Tam MT; Yungbluth M; Myles T
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 1998; 6(5):204-8. PubMed ID: 9894174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wet smear compared with gram stain diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in asymptomatic pregnant women.
Mastrobattista JM; Bishop KD; Newton ER
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 96(4):504-6. PubMed ID: 11004348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The International Infections in Pregnancy (IIP) study: variations in the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and distribution of morphotypes in vaginal smears among pregnant women.
Tolosa JE; Chaithongwongwatthana S; Daly S; Maw WW; Gaitán H; Lumbiganon P; Festin M; Chipato T; Sauvarin J; Goldenberg RL; Andrews WW; Whitney CG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1198-204. PubMed ID: 17074543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of modified diagnostic criteria for bacterial vaginosis at peripheral health centres in developing countries.
Mittal V; Jain A; Pradeep Y
J Infect Dev Ctries; 2012 May; 6(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 22610702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative real-time PCR assay versus clinical and Gram stain identification of bacterial vaginosis.
Menard JP; Mazouni C; Fenollar F; Raoult D; Boubli L; Bretelle F
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1547-52. PubMed ID: 20814710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of BV(®) Blue Test Kit for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
Kampan NC; Suffian SS; Ithnin NS; Muhammad M; Zakaria SZ; Jamil MA
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2011 Jan; 2(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 21147452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women and predictive value of clinical diagnosis.
Dadhwal V; Hariprasad R; Mittal S; Kapil A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Jan; 281(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 19381663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bacterial vaginosis: prevalence in an Italian population of asymptomatic pregnant women and diagnostic aspects.
Cristiano L; Rampello S; Noris C; Valota V
Eur J Epidemiol; 1996 Aug; 12(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 8891543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Tikur Anbessa University Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mengistie Z; Woldeamanuel Y; Asrat D; Adera A
BMC Res Notes; 2014 Nov; 7():822. PubMed ID: 25409756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Gram and Kopeloff stains in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy.
Libman MD; Kramer M; Platt R;
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2006 Mar; 54(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 16427240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bacterial vaginosis in a family practice population.
Schmidt H; Hansen JG
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Nov; 79(11):999-1005. PubMed ID: 11081687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative study between the pH test and of the KOH versus Nugent score for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women].
Campos AA; Leite AP; Lisboa CV; Andrade CC; Bezerra AF; Mattar R; Souza Ed
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2012 May; 34(5):209-14. PubMed ID: 22584855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of Amsel criteria, Nugent score, and quantitative PCR for Gardnerella vaginalis, Mycoplasma hominis, and Lactobacillus spp. for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women.
Sha BE; Chen HY; Wang QJ; Zariffard MR; Cohen MH; Spear GT
J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 43(9):4607-12. PubMed ID: 16145114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The papanicolaou smear: inadequate screening test for bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy.
Greene JF; Kuehl TJ; Allen SR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 May; 182(5):1048-9. PubMed ID: 10819823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The accuracy of various tests for bacterial vaginosis in predicting preterm birth: a systematic review.
Honest H; Bachmann LM; Knox EM; Gupta JK; Kleijnen J; Khan KS
BJOG; 2004 May; 111(5):409-22. PubMed ID: 15104603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based diagnostic method for bacterial vaginosis.
Obata-Yasuoka M; Ba-Thein W; Hamada H; Hayashi H
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 100(4):759-64. PubMed ID: 12383546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]