BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10669421)

  • 1. Evidence for DNA loss as a determinant of genome size.
    Petrov DA; Sangster TA; Johnston JS; Hartl DL; Shaw KL
    Science; 2000 Feb; 287(5455):1060-2. PubMed ID: 10669421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genomic gigantism: DNA loss is slow in mountain grasshoppers.
    Bensasson D; Petrov DA; Zhang DX; Hartl DL; Hewitt GM
    Mol Biol Evol; 2001 Feb; 18(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 11158383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perspectives: evolution. Is bigger better in cricket?
    Capy P
    Science; 2000 Feb; 287(5455):985-6. PubMed ID: 10691573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DNA loss and evolution of genome size in Drosophila.
    Petrov DA
    Genetica; 2002 May; 115(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 12188050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genome size and intron size in Drosophila.
    Moriyama EN; Petrov DA; Hartl DL
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Jun; 15(6):770-3. PubMed ID: 9615458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High intrinsic rate of DNA loss in Drosophila.
    Petrov DA; Lozovskaya ER; Hartl DL
    Nature; 1996 Nov; 384(6607):346-9. PubMed ID: 8934517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High rate of DNA loss in the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis species groups.
    Petrov DA; Hartl DL
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Mar; 15(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 9501496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trash DNA is what gets thrown away: high rate of DNA loss in Drosophila.
    Petrov DA; Hartl DL
    Gene; 1997 Dec; 205(1-2):279-89. PubMed ID: 9461402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genome size as a mutation-selection-drift process.
    Lozovskaya ER; Nurminsky DI; Petrov DA; Hartl DL
    Genes Genet Syst; 1999 Oct; 74(5):201-7. PubMed ID: 10734601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pseudogene evolution and natural selection for a compact genome.
    Petrov DA; Hartl DL
    J Hered; 2000; 91(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 10833048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Species boundaries and genetic diversity among Hawaiian crickets of the genus Laupala identified using amplified fragment length polymorphism.
    Parsons YM; Shaw KL
    Mol Ecol; 2001 Jul; 10(7):1765-72. PubMed ID: 11472543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolution of genome size: a phylogenetic test of the DNA loss hypothesis.
    Pie MR
    Genetika; 2007 Mar; 43(3):427-9. PubMed ID: 17486764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fruit flies and humans respond differently to retrotransposons.
    Eickbush TH; Furano AV
    Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2002 Dec; 12(6):669-74. PubMed ID: 12433580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patterns of nucleotide substitution in Drosophila and mammalian genomes.
    Petrov DA; Hartl DL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1999 Feb; 96(4):1475-9. PubMed ID: 9990048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons in a species radiation of acoustically diverse Hawaiian crickets (Gryllidae: trigonidiinae: Laupala).
    Mullen SP; Mendelson TC; Schal C; Shaw KL
    Evolution; 2007 Jan; 61(1):223-31. PubMed ID: 17300441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolution of the GST omega gene family in 12 Drosophila species.
    Walters KB; Grant P; Johnson DL
    J Hered; 2009; 100(6):742-53. PubMed ID: 19608790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Molecular evolution of seminal proteins in field crickets.
    Andrés JA; Maroja LS; Bogdanowicz SM; Swanson WJ; Harrison RG
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Aug; 23(8):1574-84. PubMed ID: 16731569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Drosophila genomes and the development of affordable molecular markers for species genotyping.
    Minuk L; Civetta A
    Genome; 2011 Apr; 54(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 21491976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evolution of gypsy endogenous retrovirus in the Drosophila obscura species group.
    Vázquez-Manrique RP; Hernández M; Martínez-Sebastián MJ; de Frutos R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Aug; 17(8):1185-93. PubMed ID: 10908638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Birth-and-death evolution of the Cecropin multigene family in Drosophila.
    Quesada H; Ramos-Onsins SE; Aguadé M
    J Mol Evol; 2005 Jan; 60(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15696364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.