These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10670170)

  • 21. Review of the first 50 cases completed by the RACR mammography QA programme: phantom image quality, processor control and dose considerations.
    McLean D; Eckert M; Heard R; Chan W
    Australas Radiol; 1997 Nov; 41(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 9409037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Quality control of mammography: potential use of a new device for testing the image quality and the dose].
    Di Maggio C; Gennaro G; Gambaccini M; Cattozzo S
    Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 8975313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality mammography standards--FDA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1998 Nov; 63(214):59750-1. PubMed ID: 10187387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Image quality and dose in mammography in 17 countries in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe: results from IAEA projects.
    Ciraj-Bjelac O; Avramova-Cholakova S; Beganovic A; Economides S; Faj D; Gershan V; Grupetta E; Kharita MH; Milakovic M; Milu C; Muhogora WE; Muthuvelu P; Oola S; Setayeshi S; Schandorf C; Ursulean I; Videnovic IR; Zaman A; Ziliukas J; Rehani MM
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2161-8. PubMed ID: 21665395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast cancer screening--the European experience.
    Perry NM
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2004; 49(5):228-30. PubMed ID: 15633481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Economic approach to breast cancer screening in Belgium].
    Grivegnée AR; Autier P
    Rev Med Brux; 2001 Sep; 22(4):A277-81. PubMed ID: 11680188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Technical quality control in mammography screening: first results in Belgium.
    De Luyck I; Mol H; Van Loon R; Osteaux M
    J Belge Radiol; 1995 Oct; 78(5):311-2. PubMed ID: 8550400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Assessment of mammographic units in Poland in the view of current requirements of radiation protection regulations].
    Bekas M; Pachocki KA; Rózycki Z; Wieprzowski K; Fabiszewska E
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2006; 57(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 16900867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Survey of mammography practice in Croatia: equipment performance, image quality and dose.
    Faj D; Posedel D; Stimac D; Ivezic Z; Kasabasic M; Ivkovic A; Kubelka D; Ilakovac V; Brnic Z; Bjelac OC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 18940818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Central online quality assurance in radiology: an IT solution exemplified by the German Breast Cancer Screening Program].
    Czwoydzinski J; Girnus R; Sommer A; Heindel W; Lenzen H
    Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):849-54. PubMed ID: 21830180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Survey on image quality and dose levels used in Europe for mammography.
    Verdun FR; Moeckli R; Valley JF; Bochud F; Hessler C
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Aug; 69(824):762-8. PubMed ID: 8949680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for cytology laboratories.
    Wiener HG; Klinkhamer P; Schenck U; Arbyn M; Bulten J; Bergeron C; Herbert A
    Cytopathology; 2007 Apr; 18(2):67-78. PubMed ID: 17397490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Mammogram results in ambulatory care--a mammography quality circle in Braunschweig, Germany, between 1998 and 2001].
    Derra M; Green E; Hintner H; Hübler R; Sabih S; Thieme H; Wezler U; Robra BP; Swart E
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2004 Aug; 98(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 15487384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Primary care practice and facility quality orientation: influence on breast and cervical cancer screening rates.
    Goldzweig CL; Parkerton PH; Washington DL; Lanto AB; Yano EM
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Apr; 10(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 15124503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Guideline for the additional test positions according to the EPQC 4th Edition for Digital Mammography Systems].
    Sommer A; Lenzen H; Blaser D; Ehlers SE; Schopphoven S; John C;
    Rofo; 2009 Sep; 181(9):845-50. PubMed ID: 19676011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Quality assurance of mammographic devices].
    Nowotny R; Semturs F
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2001; 151(21-23):556-9. PubMed ID: 11762254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of equipment performance, patient dose, imaging quality, and diagnostic coincidence in five Mexico City mammography services.
    Brandan ME; Ruiz-Trejo C; Verdejo-Silva M; Guevara M; Lozano-Zalce H; Madero-Preciado L; Martín J; Noel-Etienne LM; Ramírez-Arias JL; Soto J; Villaseñor Y
    Arch Med Res; 2004; 35(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15036796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Technical quality control practices in mammography screening programs in 22 countries.
    Hendrick RE; Klabunde C; Grivegnee A; Pou G; Ballard-Barbash R
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Jun; 14(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 12108532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of quality assurance programmes for HIV screening in blood transfusion centres in Delhi.
    Dhingra-Kumar N; Sharma AK; Madan N
    Bull World Health Organ; 1997; 75(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 9277009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.