203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10670471)
1. Response variability in the visual field: comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes.
Henson DB; Chaudry S; Artes PH; Faragher EB; Ansons A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Feb; 41(2):417-21. PubMed ID: 10670471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between electrophysiological, psychophysical, and anatomical measurements in glaucoma.
Garway-Heath DF; Holder GE; Fitzke FW; Hitchings RA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jul; 43(7):2213-20. PubMed ID: 12091419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detecting early functional damage in glaucoma suspect and ocular hypertensive patients with the multifocal VEP technique.
Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC; Chu DH; Xu L; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Hood DC
J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 16865010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of optic nerve head topography and visual field in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.
Boland MV; Zhang L; Broman AT; Jampel HD; Quigley HA
Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):239-245.e2. PubMed ID: 18082888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between visual field sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness as measured by optical coherence tomography.
Ajtony C; Balla Z; Somoskeoy S; Kovacs B
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 48(1):258-63. PubMed ID: 17197541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Photopic negative response of focal electoretinograms in glaucomatous eyes.
Machida S; Toba Y; Ohtaki A; Gotoh Y; Kaneko M; Kurosaka D
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 49(12):5636-44. PubMed ID: 18641287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The statistical interpretation of blue-on-yellow visual field loss.
Wild JM; Moss ID; Whitaker D; O'Neill EC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1398-410. PubMed ID: 7775118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons.
Kerrigan-Baumrind LA; Quigley HA; Pease ME; Kerrigan DF; Mitchell RS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Mar; 41(3):741-8. PubMed ID: 10711689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry and optical coherence tomography measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in both normal and ocular hypertensive subjects.
Mastropasqua L; Brusini P; Carpineto P; Ciancaglini M; Di Antonio L; Zeppieri MW; Parisi L
J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 16865011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retinal sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.
Miglior S; Riva I; Guareschi M; Di Matteo F; Romanazzi F; Buffagni L; Rulli E
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 144(5):733-740. PubMed ID: 17707327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristics of frequency-of-seeing curves in normal subjects, patients with suspected glaucoma, and patients with glaucoma.
Chauhan BC; Tompkins JD; LeBlanc RP; McCormick TA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Dec; 34(13):3534-40. PubMed ID: 8258511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The psychometric function and reaction times of automated perimetry in normal and abnormal areas of the visual field in patients with glaucoma.
Wall M; Maw RJ; Stanek KE; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Apr; 37(5):878-85. PubMed ID: 8603872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fluorescein filling defects of the optic nerve head in normal tension glaucoma, primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and healthy controls.
Plange N; Kaup M; Huber K; Remky A; Arend O
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 16390479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A comparison study of pulsitile ocular blood flow in normal eyes and primary open angle glaucoma].
Zhang MZ; Fu ZF; Liu XR; Zheng C
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 40(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 15268833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perimetric sensitivity and response variability in glaucoma with single-stimulus automated perimetry and multiple-stimulus perimetry with verbal feedback.
Miranda MA; Henson DB
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 18005269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Photopic negative response of the human ERG: losses associated with glaucomatous damage.
Colotto A; Falsini B; Salgarello T; Iarossi G; Galan ME; Scullica L
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2205-11. PubMed ID: 10892864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
