These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10670667)

  • 1. Incidence of pecking damage in growing bantams in relation to food form, group size, stocking density, dietary tryptophan concentration and dietary protein source.
    Savory CJ; Mann JS; MacLeod MG
    Br Poult Sci; 1999 Dec; 40(5):579-84. PubMed ID: 10670667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feather pecking damage in growing bantams is influenced by dietary tryptophan concentration but not dietary protein source.
    Savory CJ
    Br Poult Sci; 1998 Dec; 39 Suppl():S17-8. PubMed ID: 10188023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of pecking damage in layer pullets in relation to dietary protein source.
    McKeegan DE; Savory CJ; MacLeod MG; Mitchell MA
    Br Poult Sci; 2001 Mar; 42(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 11337965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of plastic anti-pecking devices on food intake and behaviour of laying hens fed on pellets or mash.
    Savory CJ; Hetherington JD
    Br Poult Sci; 1997 May; 38(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 9158884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feather pecking in groups of growing bantams in relation to floor litter substrate and plumage colour.
    Savory CJ; Mann JS
    Br Poult Sci; 1999 Dec; 40(5):565-72. PubMed ID: 10670665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of foraging material and food form on feather pecking in laying hens.
    Aerni V; El-Lethey H; Wechsler B
    Br Poult Sci; 2000 Mar; 41(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 10821517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Behavioural development in groups of pen-housed pullets in relation to genetic strain, age and food form.
    Savory CJ; Mann JS
    Br Poult Sci; 1997 Mar; 38(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 9088611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strain and age differences in behaviour, fear response and pecking tendency in laying hens.
    Albentosa MJ; Kjaer JB; Nicol CJ
    Br Poult Sci; 2003 Jul; 44(3):333-44. PubMed ID: 13677322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of loose feathers on the development of feather pecking in laying hens.
    Ramadan SG; von Borell E
    Br Poult Sci; 2008 May; 49(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 18568748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of risk factors for the occurrence of feather pecking in laying hen growers.
    Huber-Eicher B; Audigé L
    Br Poult Sci; 1999 Dec; 40(5):599-604. PubMed ID: 10670670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of protein concentration on responses to dietary tryptophan by chicks.
    Abebe S; Morris TR
    Br Poult Sci; 1990 Jun; 31(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 2372707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential effects of 4 types of environmental enrichment on aggressive pecking, feather pecking, feather loss, food wastage and productivity in Japanese quail.
    Miller KA; Mench JA
    Br Poult Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(6):646-58. PubMed ID: 17190672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavioural adaptation of laying hens to dilution of diets under mash and pellet form.
    Vilariño M; Picard ML; Melcion JP; Faure JM
    Br Poult Sci; 1996 Dec; 37(5):895-907. PubMed ID: 9034580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress and feather pecking in laying hens in relation to housing conditions.
    El-Lethey H; Aerni V; Jungi TW; Wechsler B
    Br Poult Sci; 2000 Mar; 41(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 10821518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of furnished cages for laying hens.
    Appleby MC; Walker AW; Nicol CJ; Lindberg AC; Freire R; Hughes BO; Elson HA
    Br Poult Sci; 2002 Sep; 43(4):489-500. PubMed ID: 12365505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feather pecking in chickens is genetically related to behavioural and developmental traits.
    Jensen P; Keeling L; Schütz K; Andersson L; Mormède P; Brändström H; Forkman B; Kerje S; Fredriksson R; Ohlsson C; Larsson S; Mallmin H; Kindmark A
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Sep; 86(1-2):52-60. PubMed ID: 16098546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the welfare consequences of providing litter for feed-restricted broiler breeders.
    Hocking PM; Jones EK; Picard M
    Br Poult Sci; 2005 Oct; 46(5):545-52. PubMed ID: 16359106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of choice feeding on the performance of broilers.
    Olver MD; Jonker A
    Br Poult Sci; 1997 Dec; 38(5):571-6. PubMed ID: 9511003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of vision-restricting "polypeepers" on the behaviour of laying hens during adaptation, feeding, on general activity, agonistic behaviour and pecking damage.
    Arbi A; Cumming RB; Wodzicka-Tomaszewska M
    Br Poult Sci; 1983 Jul; 24(3):371-81. PubMed ID: 6684495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reaction to frustration in high and low feather pecking lines of laying hens from commercial or semi-natural rearing conditions.
    Rodenburg TB; Koene P; Spruijt BM
    Behav Processes; 2004 Feb; 65(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 15222965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.