These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1067291)

  • 1. Stress analysis of porous rooted dental implants.
    Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Anand SC; Schuessler R
    J Dent Res; 1976; 55(5):772-7. PubMed ID: 1067291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of a porous rooted Co-Cr-Mo alloy dental implant.
    Cook SD; Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ
    J Dent Res; 1982 Jan; 61(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 6948012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fabrication and characterization of porous-rooted cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (Co-Cr-Mo) alloy dental implants.
    Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM; Peterson LJ
    J Dent Res; 1977 May; 56(5):474-80. PubMed ID: 267100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A model for the implant-bone interface characteristics of porous dental implants.
    Cook SD; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
    J Dent Res; 1982 Aug; 61(8):1006-9. PubMed ID: 6955334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention characteristics of porous rooted Co-Cr-Mo alloy dental implants.
    Cook SD; Weinstein AM; Sander TA; Klawitter JJ
    Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1982; 10(2):123-46. PubMed ID: 7139020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical, radiographical, and histological evaluation of porous rooted polymethylmethacrylate dental implants.
    Peterson LJ; Pennel BM; McKinney RV; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
    J Dent Res; 1979 Jan; 58(1):489-96. PubMed ID: 282305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
    Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and evaluation of porous dental implants in miniature swine.
    Karagianes MT; Westerman RE; Rasmussen JJ; Lodmell AM
    J Dent Res; 1976; 55(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 173745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-dimensional FEM analysis of hydroxyapatite implants: diameter effects on stress distribution.
    Matsushita Y; Kitoh M; Mizuta K; Ikeda H; Suetsugu T
    J Oral Implantol; 1990; 16(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 2074593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of tapered and external hexagon connections on bone stresses around tilted dental implants: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical analysis.
    de Faria Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Santiago JF; de Carvalho PS
    J Periodontol; 2014 Feb; 85(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 23688104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fabrication and characterization of porous-rooted polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) dental implants.
    Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM; Peterson LJ
    J Dent Res; 1977 Apr; 56(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 265969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Micromechanics of implant/tissue interfaces.
    Ko CC; Kohn DH; Hollister SJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1992; 18(3):220-30. PubMed ID: 1289557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
    Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
    Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stress dissipation in the bone through various crown materials of dental implant restoration: a 2-D finite element analysis.
    Bijjargi S; Chowdhary R
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Aug; 4(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 23172842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interaction effects among cortical bone, cancellous bone, and periodontal membrane of natural teeth and implants.
    Wider GE; Tesk JA; Privitzer E
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1976 Jul; 10(4):613-23. PubMed ID: 947923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical properties of bone-implant interface: an in vitro comparison of the parameters at placement and at 3 months.
    Brosh T; Persovski Z; Binderman I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(6):729-35. PubMed ID: 8530176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis.
    Fazi G; Tellini S; Vangi D; Branchi R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):752-9. PubMed ID: 21841984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
    Sertgöz A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9484066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.