342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10673651)
1. Efficacy of high-density versus semipermeable PTFE membranes in an elderly experimental model.
Marouf HA; El-Guindi HM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Feb; 89(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 10673651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of resorbable and nonresorbable guided bone regeneration materials: a preliminary study.
McGinnis M; Larsen P; Miloro M; Beck FM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 9509777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancement of bone ingrowth into collagen/HA composite implants using e-PTFE membranes.
Marouf HA; al-Khateeb TL; Cataldo E
J Ir Dent Assoc; 1999; 45(2):52-7. PubMed ID: 10686923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a high-density polytetrafluoroethylene (n-PTFE) membrane as a barrier material to facilitate guided bone regeneration in the rat mandible.
Bartee BK; Carr JA
J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 8699509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vertical ridge augmentation by expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and a combination of intraoral autogenous bone graft and deproteinized anorganic bovine bone (Bio Oss).
Simion M; Fontana F; Rasperini G; Maiorana C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):620-9. PubMed ID: 17877463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Guided osteogenesis using synthetic membranes and alloplastic materials: a pilot study.
Aybar B; Günhan O; Bilgiç L; Emes Y
Quintessence Int; 2003 Feb; 34(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12666860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tissue regeneration in bone defects adjacent to endosseous implants: an experimental pilot study.
De Vicente JC; López-Arranz E; López-Arranz JS
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Feb; 20(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 11203547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration.
Zitzmann NU; Naef R; Schärer P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):844-52. PubMed ID: 9425767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vertical ridge augmentation around implants by e-PTFE titanium-reinforced membrane and bovine bone matrix: a 24- to 54-month study of 10 consecutive cases.
Canullo L; Malagnino VA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):858-66. PubMed ID: 19014155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Osseointegration of titanium implants following guided bone regeneration using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and various bone fillers.
Fiorellini JP; Kim DM; Nakajima Y; Weber HP
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Jun; 27(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 17694952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vivosorb, Bio-Gide, and Gore-Tex as barrier membranes in rat mandibular defects: an evaluation by microradiography and micro-CT.
Gielkens PF; Schortinghuis J; de Jong JR; Raghoebar GM; Stegenga B; Bos RR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 May; 19(5):516-21. PubMed ID: 18416728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of guided bone regeneration using absorbable and permanent barrier membranes: a histologic report.
Wiltfang J; Merten HA; Peters JH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 9638014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A histologic evaluation of localized ridge augmentation utilizing DFDBA in combination with e-PTFE membranes and stainless steel bone pins in humans.
Doblin JM; Salkin LM; Mellado JR; Freedman AL; Stein MD
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Apr; 16(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 9084300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of bioabsorbable and non-resorbable barrier membranes on bone augmentation in rabbit calvaria.
Ito K; Nanba K; Murai S
J Periodontol; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1229-37. PubMed ID: 9848532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Guided tissue regeneration around dental implants in immediate extraction sockets: comparison of resorbable and nonresorbable membranes].
Mao C; Sato J; Matsuura M; Seto K
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1997 Dec; 19(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 10453535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two resorbable membrane systems in bone regeneration after removal of wisdom teeth: a randomized-controlled clinical pilot study.
Zwahlen RA; Cheung LK; Zheng LW; Chow RL; Li T; Schuknecht B; Grätz KW; Weber FE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1084-91. PubMed ID: 19751357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of 5 different membranes for guided bone regeneration of rabbit mandibular defects beyond critical size.
Thomaidis V; Kazakos K; Lyras DN; Dimitrakopoulos I; Lazaridis N; Karakasis D; Botaitis S; Agrogiannis G
Med Sci Monit; 2008 Apr; 14(4):BR67-73. PubMed ID: 18376341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The efficacy of a double-layer collagen membrane technique for overlaying block grafts in a rabbit calvarium model.
Kim SH; Kim DY; Kim KH; Ku Y; Rhyu IC; Lee YM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1124-32. PubMed ID: 19508339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The combined use of enamel matrix proteins and a tetracycline-coated expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier membrane in the treatment of intra-osseous defects.
Sipos PM; Loos BG; Abbas F; Timmerman MF; van der Velden U
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Jul; 32(7):765-72. PubMed ID: 15966884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
