BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

580 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10673692)

  • 1. Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells with paclitaxel (taxol) as a single chemotheraupetic agent, associated with rhG-CSF.
    Gómez-Espuch J; Moraleda JM; Ortuño F; Lozano ML; Ayala F; Vallejo C; de Arriba F; Vicente V
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Feb; 25(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 10673692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stem cell mobilization with G-CSF alone in breast cancer patients: higher progenitor cell yield by delivering divided doses (2 x 5 microg/kg) compared to a single dose (1 x 10 microg/kg).
    Kröger N; Zeller W; Hassan HT; Krüger W; Gutensohn K; Löliger C; Zander AR
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Jan; 23(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 10197796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Autologous peripheral blood stem cells mobilization with etoposide plus rhG-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF].
    Shi YK; He XH; Han XH; Liu P; Yang JL; Zhou SY; Zhou AP; Zhang CG; Ai B
    Ai Zheng; 2003 Dec; 22(12):1311-6. PubMed ID: 14693058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collection of peripheral blood stem cells following administration of paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, and filgrastim in patients with breast and ovarian cancer.
    Weaver CH; Schwartzberg LS; Birch R; Greco FA; Hainsworth J; Drapkin R; Campos L; Grapski R; Schwerkoske J; Lautersztain J; Hazelton B; Schnell F; Babcock W; Buckner CD
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 1997 Jun; 3(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 9267668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim.
    Weaver CH; Schulman KA; Buckner CD
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 May; 27 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 11436117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone.
    Alegre A; Tomás JF; Martínez-Chamorro C; Gil-Fernández JJ; Fernández-Villalta MJ; Arranz R; Díaz MA; Granda A; Bernardo MR; Escudero A; López-Lorenzo JL; Fernández-Rañada JM
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1997 Aug; 20(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9257889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peripheral-blood stem-cell collections after paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with breast and ovarian cancer.
    Demirer T; Rowley S; Buckner CD; Appelbaum FR; Lilleby K; Storb R; Schiffman K; Bensinger WI
    J Clin Oncol; 1995 Jul; 13(7):1714-9. PubMed ID: 7541450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mobilization of PBSCs with chemotherapy and recombinant human G-CSF: a randomized evaluation of early vs late administration of recombinant human G-CSF.
    Ozcelik T; Topcuoglu P; Beksac M; Ozcan M; Arat M; Biyikli Z; Bakanay SM; Ilhan O; Gurman G; Arslan O; Demirer T
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2009 Dec; 44(12):779-83. PubMed ID: 19597420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of sequential priming and mobilisation of progenitor cells with rhG-CSF alone and high-dose cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF.
    Meldgaard Knudsen L; Jensen L; Gaarsdal E; Nikolaisen K; Johnsen HE
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Oct; 26(7):717-22. PubMed ID: 11042651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Very large amounts of peripheral blood progenitor cells eliminate severe thrombocytopenia after high-dose melphalan in advanced breast cancer patients.
    Benedetti G; Patoia L; Giglietti A; Alessio M; Pelicci P; Grignani F
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Nov; 24(9):971-9. PubMed ID: 10556956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells for autografting with low-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
    Bellido M; Sureda A; Martino R; Madoz P; García J; Brunet S
    Haematologica; 1998 May; 83(5):428-31. PubMed ID: 9658727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
    Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Superior autologous blood stem cell mobilization from dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin plus G-CSF than from less intensive chemotherapy regimens.
    Stewart DA; Guo D; Morris D; Poon MC; Ruether BA; Jones AR; Klassen J; Auer I; Luider J; Chaudhry A; Brown C; Russell JA
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Jan; 23(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 10197794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recombinant human granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF and GM-CSF) administered following cytotoxic chemotherapy have a similar ability to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells.
    Hohaus S; Martin H; Wassmann B; Egerer G; Haus U; Färber L; Burger KJ; Goldschmidt H; Hoelzer D; Haas R
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Oct; 22(7):625-30. PubMed ID: 9818688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CD34+ cells mobilized by cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) are functionally different from CD34+ cells mobilized by G-CSF.
    Cesana C; Carlo-Stella C; Regazzi E; Garau D; Sammarelli G; Caramatti C; Tabilio A; Mangoni L; Rizzoli V
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Mar; 21(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 9543059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The VAD chemotherapy regimen plus a G-CSF dose of 10 microg/kg is as effective and less toxic than high-dose cyclophosphamide plus a G-CSF dose of 5 microg/kg for progenitor cell mobilization: results from a monocentric study of 82 patients.
    Lefrère F; Zohar S; Ghez D; Delarue R; Audat F; Suarez F; Hermine O; Damaj G; Maillard N; Ribeil JA; Azagury M; Misbahi R; Jondeau K; Cavazzana-Calvo M; Dal Cortivo L; Varet B
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2006 Apr; 37(8):725-9. PubMed ID: 16518433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) through a combination of chemotherapy and G-CSF in breast cancer patients and a possibility of unprocessed whole blood collection.
    Vanásek J; Filip S; Medková V; Bláha M; Mericka P; Volenec K
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Jan; 21(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 9489627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Etoposide 1.0 g/m2 or 1.5 g/m2 combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with malignancy: efficacy and toxicity.
    Li B; Yang JL; Shi YK; He XH; Han XH; Zhou SY; Liu P; Yang S; Zhang CG
    Cytotherapy; 2009; 11(3):362-71. PubMed ID: 19037766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy and toxicity of a high-dose G-CSF schedule for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in healthy donors.
    Martínez C; Urbano-Ispizua A; Marín P; Merino A; Rovira M; Carreras E; Montserrat E
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Dec; 24(12):1273-8. PubMed ID: 10627634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blood progenitor cell (BPC) mobilization studied in multiple myeloma, solid tumor and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients after combination chemotherapy and G-CSF.
    Engelhardt M; Winkler J; Waller C; Lange W; Mertelsmann R; Henschler R
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1997 Mar; 19(6):529-37. PubMed ID: 9181898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.