These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10673948)

  • 1. Comparison of adult and paediatric spine and whole body software for the Lunar dual energy X-ray absorptiometer.
    Laskey MA; Prentice A
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Oct; 72(862):967-76. PubMed ID: 10673948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of tissue depth and composition on the performance of the Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer whole-body scanning mode.
    Laskey MA; Lyttle KD; Flaxman ME; Barber RW
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1992 Jan; 46(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 1559506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A DXA Whole Body Composition Cross-Calibration Experience: Evaluation With Humans, Spine, and Whole Body Phantoms.
    Krueger D; Libber J; Sanfilippo J; Yu HJ; Horvath B; Miller CG; Binkley N
    J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 26071169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation dose and in vitro precision in paediatric bone mineral density measurement using dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Njeh CF; Samat SB; Nightingale A; McNeil EA; Boivin CM
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jul; 70(835):719-27. PubMed ID: 9245884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages.
    Van Loan MD; Keim NL; Berg K; Mayclin PL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Apr; 27(4):587-91. PubMed ID: 7791591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Large variations occur in bone density measurements of children when using different software.
    Simpson DE; Dontu VS; Stephens SE; Archbold LJ; Lowe V; O'Doherty MJ; Martin N; Coakley AJ
    Nucl Med Commun; 2005 Jun; 26(6):483-7. PubMed ID: 15891590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anomalies in the measurement of changes in total-body bone mineral by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry during weight change.
    Tothill P; Hannan WJ; Cowen S; Freeman CP
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Nov; 12(11):1908-21. PubMed ID: 9383696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anomalies in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of total-body bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instruments.
    Tothill P; Laskey MA; Orphanidou CI; van Wijk M
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 72(859):661-9. PubMed ID: 10624323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The accuracy and precision of DXA for assessing body composition in team sport athletes.
    Bilsborough JC; Greenway K; Opar D; Livingstone S; Cordy J; Coutts AJ
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(19):1821-8. PubMed ID: 24914773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-calibration of GE/Lunar pencil and fan-beam dual energy densitometers--bone mineral density and body composition studies.
    Oldroyd B; Smith AH; Truscott JG
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Aug; 57(8):977-87. PubMed ID: 12879093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
    Tothill P; Hannan WJ; Wilkinson S
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 74(878):166-76. PubMed ID: 11718390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do Textiles Impact DXA Bone Density or Body Composition Results?
    Siglinsky E; Binkley N; Krueger D
    J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(2):303-307. PubMed ID: 28988694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and comparison with dual-photon absorptiometry.
    Lees B; Stevenson JC
    Osteoporos Int; 1992 May; 2(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 1627902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of fan-beam DXA measurements in adults and phantoms.
    Ellis KJ; Shypailo RS; Steinberg FM; Lewis RD; Young RL; Wong WW
    J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 15618602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hologic QDR 2000 whole-body scans: a comparison of three combinations of scan modes and analysis software.
    Spector E; LeBlanc A; Shackelford L
    Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(6):440-5. PubMed ID: 8695965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Positive and negative effect of exogenous fat on the bone mineral density in healthy women by dual energy X-ray absorptiometer].
    Wu Y; Deng X; Jiang S
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Apr; 35(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 20448360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements and association with their covariates.
    Powers C; Fan B; Borrud LG; Looker AC; Shepherd JA
    J Clin Densitom; 2015; 18(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 24200863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A phantom for evaluating bone mineral density of the hand by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Steel SA; Swann P; Langley G; Langton CM
    Physiol Meas; 1997 Aug; 18(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 9290140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of dual-photon absorptiometry systems for total-body bone and soft tissue measurements: dual-energy X-rays versus gadolinium 153.
    Russell-Aulet M; Wang J; Thornton J; Pierson RN
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Apr; 6(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 1858524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Precision and accuracy of measurements of whole-body bone mineral: comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
    Tothill P; Avenell A; Reid DM
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 67(804):1210-7. PubMed ID: 7874420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.