These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10674481)

  • 21. Task difficulty modulates electrophysiological correlates of perceptual learning.
    Wang Y; Song Y; Qu Z; Ding Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 19969030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attention-dependent sound offset-related brain potentials.
    Horváth J
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):663-77. PubMed ID: 26757414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The duality of selection: excitatory and inhibitory processes in auditory selective attention.
    Melara RD; Rao A; Tong Y
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):279-306. PubMed ID: 11999855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Processing of melodic contours in urethane-anaesthetized rats.
    Ruusuvirta T; Koivisto K; Wikgren J; Astikainen P
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 26(3):701-3. PubMed ID: 17634069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Object recognition learning differentiates the representations of objects at the ERP component N1.
    Wang G; Suemitsu K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):372-80. PubMed ID: 17141565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Behavioural and ERP indices of response inhibition during a Stop-signal task in children with two subtypes of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Oct; 66(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 17604142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Frequency discrimination in rats measured with tone-step stimuli and discrete pure tones.
    Sloan AM; Dodd OT; Rennaker RL
    Hear Res; 2009 May; 251(1-2):60-9. PubMed ID: 19258029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acute dosing of vortioxetine strengthens event-related brain activity associated with engagement of attention and cognitive functioning in rats.
    Laursen B; Bundgaard CH; Graversen C; Grupe M; Sanchez C; Leiser SC; Sorensen HBD; Drewes AM; Bastlund JF
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():37-47. PubMed ID: 28366617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Source analysis of event-related potentials during pitch discrimination and pitch memory tasks.
    Talja S; Alho K; Rinne T
    Brain Topogr; 2015 May; 28(3):445-58. PubMed ID: 24043402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3.
    Goldstein A; Spencer KM; Donchin E
    Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 12462506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evoked potentials in the dentate gyrus reflect the retention of past sensory events.
    West MO; Christian E; Robinson JH; Deadwyler SA
    Neurosci Lett; 1982 Mar; 28(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 7078839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Early and rapid perceptual learning.
    Hawkey DJ; Amitay S; Moore DR
    Nat Neurosci; 2004 Oct; 7(10):1055-6. PubMed ID: 15361880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Segregation of task-relevant conditioned stimuli from background stimuli by associative learning.
    Rothe T; Deliano M; Scheich H; Stark H
    Brain Res; 2009 Nov; 1297():143-59. PubMed ID: 19703425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Event-related brain potential of human newborns to pitch change of an acoustic stimulus.
    Alho K; Sainio K; Sajaniemi N; Reinikainen K; Näätänen R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 1690117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evoked Frontal and Parietal Field Potential Signatures of Target Detection and Response Inhibition in Rats Performing an Equiprobable Auditory Go/No-Go Task.
    Nanda P; Morris A; Kelemen J; Yang J; Wiest MC
    eNeuro; 2020; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 31767572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of involuntary auditory attention on visual task performance and brain activity.
    Alho K; Escera C; Díaz R; Yago E; Serra JM
    Neuroreport; 1997 Oct; 8(15):3233-7. PubMed ID: 9351649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. N1 and the mismatch negativity are spatiotemporally distinct ERP components: disruption of immediate memory by auditory distraction can be related to N1.
    Campbell T; Winkler I; Kujala T
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jul; 44(4):530-40. PubMed ID: 17532805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. P300, habituation, and response mode.
    Lew GS; Polich J
    Physiol Behav; 1993 Jan; 53(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 8434050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Can subitizing survive the attentional blink? An ERP study.
    Xu X; Liu C
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug; 440(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 18556118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.