These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10674719)

  • 1. Conization of the cervix using harmonic scalpel.
    Konno R; Akahira J; Igarashi T; Yamakawa H; Sato S; Yajima A
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 1999 Nov; 189(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 10674719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conization by harmonic scalpel for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a clinicopathological study.
    Akahira J; Konno R; Moriya T; Yamakawa H; Igarashi T; Ito K; Sato S; Yajima A
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2000; 50(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 11093051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
    Mathevet P; Dargent D; Roy M; Beau G
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8063242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
    Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recurrence rate after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and laser Conization: A 5-year follow-up study.
    Bogani G; DI Donato V; Sopracordevole F; Ciavattini A; Ghelardi A; Lopez S; Simoncini T; Plotti F; Casarin J; Serati M; Pinelli C; Valenti G; Bergamini A; Gardella B; Dell'acqua A; Monti E; Vercellini P; Fischetti M; D'Ippolito G; Aguzzoli L; Mandato VD; Carunchio P; Carlinfante G; Giannella L; Scaffa C; Falcone F; Borghi C; Ditto A; Malzoni M; Giannini A; Salerno MG; Liberale V; Contino B; Donfrancesco C; Desiato M; Perrone AM; Dondi G; De Iaco P; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Signorelli M; Chiappa V; Ferrero S; Sarpietro G; Matarazzo MG; Cianci A; Bosio S; Ruisi S; Guerrisi R; Brusadelli C; Mosca L; Tinelli R; DE Vincenzo R; Zannoni GF; Ferrandina G; Petrillo M; Dessole S; Angioli R; Greggi S; Spinillo A; Ghezzi F; Colacurci N; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):636-641. PubMed ID: 32893030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
    Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
    Mathevet P; Chemali E; Roy M; Dargent D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Feb; 106(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 12551795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Excisional treatment in women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS): a prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority trial to compare AIS persistence/recurrence after loop electrosurgical excision procedure with cold knife cone biopsy: protocol for a pilot study.
    Cohen PA; Brand A; Sykes P; Wrede DCH; McNally O; Eva L; Rao A; Campion M; Stockler M; Powell A; Codde J; Bulsara MK; Anderson L; Leung Y; Farrell L; Stoyles P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e017576. PubMed ID: 28851799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interpretability of excisional biopsies of the cervix: cone biopsy and loop excision.
    Miroshnichenko GG; Parva M; Holtz DO; Klemens JA; Dunton CJ
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 19098600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias].
    Hillemanns P; Kimmig R; Dannecker C; Noorzai T; Diebold J; Thaler CJ; Hepp H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10785949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery.
    Sadler L; Saftlas A; Wang W; Exeter M; Whittaker J; McCowan L
    JAMA; 2004 May; 291(17):2100-6. PubMed ID: 15126438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors influencing the choice between cold knife conization and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Shin JW; Rho HS; Park CY
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 19215559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization.
    Baldauf JJ; Dreyfus M; Ritter J; Meyer P; Philippe E
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Dec; 88(6):933-8. PubMed ID: 8942830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife conization on pregnancy outcomes.
    Guo HJ; Guo RX; Liu YL
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 23590007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.
    Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conization using electrosurgical conization and cold coagulation for international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IA1 squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix.
    Lee SJ; Kim WY; Lee JW; Kim HS; Choi YL; Ahn GH; Lee JH; Kim BG; Bae DS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Apr; 19(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 19407568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Two Step LEEP and Cold Conisation For Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions to Decrease Positive Surgical Margins.
    Senol T; Polat M; Ozkaya E; Karateke A
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(7):3317-20. PubMed ID: 27509969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins.
    Ayhan A; Tuncer HA; Reyhan NH; Kuscu E; Dursun P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():1-6. PubMed ID: 27038228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of cervical length and optimal timing for pregnancy after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A retrospective study.
    Zhang X; Tong J; Ma X; Yu H; Guan X; Li J; Yang J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Dec; 99(49):e23411. PubMed ID: 33285731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia before and after introduction of laser conization].
    Nordland K; Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Jan; 125(2):167-9. PubMed ID: 15665889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.