These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10674786)

  • 21. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of mammographic film processor performance in a hospital and mobile screening unit.
    Murray JG; Dowsett DJ; Laird O; Ennis JT
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Dec; 65(780):1097-101. PubMed ID: 1286417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Consistency of film optical density in mammographic screening programmes.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Apr; 69(820):306-10. PubMed ID: 8665129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optical density variations in CT films and their effect on image quality.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Papoutsis GV; Maniatis PN; Gogos KA
    Br J Radiol; 2006 May; 79(941):425-31. PubMed ID: 16632624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The evaluation of the performance of a new-concept screen-film system].
    Tosi G; Brambilla MG; De Crescenzo S
    Radiol Med; 1992 Nov; 84(5):641-4. PubMed ID: 1475429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A sensitometric comparison of Fuji Super HR-G and Kodak T-mat G panoramic films.
    Benson BW; Frederiksen NL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 May; 79(5):646-8. PubMed ID: 7600231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An interlaboratory measurement of screen-film speed and average gradient according to ISO 9236-1.
    Buhr E; Bergmann D; Hoeschen D; Ailliet M; Sirand-Rey G; Gazzola C; Uras S
    Med Phys; 2000 Feb; 27(2):307-11. PubMed ID: 10718133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does quantity of film reading affect quality?
    Given-Wilson R; Blanks R
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Feb; 66(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 21216322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.
    Peer S; Peer R; Giacomuzzi SM; Jaschke W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):69-71. PubMed ID: 11487846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Film/cassette size: time for a change?
    Bohland RJ
    Radiol Technol; 1994; 65(5):287. PubMed ID: 8058904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sensitometric and image analysis of T-grain film.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Aug; 62(2):218-20. PubMed ID: 3462620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of several Dupont portal film systems.
    Li H; Xu Z; Almond PR
    Med Dosim; 1996; 21(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 8899683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A quality control program for cine radiography.
    Renaud L; Morissette R
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 6526849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Processor quality assurance using digital imaging.
    Goren AD; Dunn SM; Van der Stelt PF
    N Y State Dent J; 1997 Apr; 63(4):42-7. PubMed ID: 9167431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optical density changes in dry-processed films.
    Al Khalifah K; Brindhaban A; Al Baloul G; Al Bather F; Abdulgafoor M
    Radiol Technol; 2007; 79(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 17848529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A laboratory evaluation of Ektaspeed Plus dental X-ray film.
    Horner K; Rushton VE; Shearer AC
    J Dent; 1995 Dec; 23(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 8530727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automatic film processing: analysis of 9 years of observations.
    Suleiman OH; Conway BJ; Rueter FG; Slayton RJ
    Radiology; 1992 Oct; 185(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 1523318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A sensitometric comparison of four dental X-ray films and their diagnostic accuracy.
    Svenson B; Welander U; Shi XQ; Stamatakis H; Tronje G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 9442614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Demise of film.
    Avrin DE; Urbania TH
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):303-4. PubMed ID: 24507419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.