These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10674786)

  • 41. Effects of solution depletion on films developed in the Peri-Pro automatic processor.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jan; 57(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 6582420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sensitometric and archival evaluation of Kodak RA films in dental automatic processing.
    Thunthy KH; Yeadon WR; Winberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 8015810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Image digitizing in conventional radiology.
    Bédard L; Delisle C
    Can J Med Radiat Technol; 1992 May; 23(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 10118925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A laboratory evaluation of four quality control devices for radiographic processing.
    Rushton VE; Horner K
    J Dent; 1994 Aug; 22(4):213-22. PubMed ID: 7962896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The digital film viewer: a novel technology for optimizing film-based radiology.
    Inbar D; Sohval AR
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):192-7. PubMed ID: 9735467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influence of film fog on radiographic caries diagnosis.
    Svenson B; Gröndahl HG; Lindvall AM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 Aug; 19(3):105-8. PubMed ID: 2088781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Analysis of an image quality assurance program.
    Göthlin JH; Alders B
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 5(3):228-30. PubMed ID: 4029161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sensitometric evaluation of a new F-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11175270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Influence of scattered radiation and tube potential on radiographic contrast: comparison of two different dental X-ray films.
    Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O; Sandborg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):135-46. PubMed ID: 1807997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [The quality of radiology services in five Latin American countries].
    Fleitas I; Caspani CC; Borrás C; Plazas MC; Miranda AA; Brandan ME; de la Mora R
    Rev Panam Salud Publica; 2006; 20(2-3):113-24. PubMed ID: 17199906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Investigation of simple Wiener spectrum measurement in medical imaging systems].
    Wang ZK; Zhao S; Zhang JY; Zhang WM
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 30(2):136-8. PubMed ID: 16830811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Checking the consistency of sensitometers and film processors in a mammographic screening programme.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):143-7. PubMed ID: 8785642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Computerized prediction of optical density for diagnostic radiology.
    Schoenfeld CM; Lautenschlager EP; Moore BK; Rechtien JJ
    J Dent Res; 1977 Sep; 56(9):1085-92. PubMed ID: 270506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Use of a "sandwich" technique to control image geometry in clinical studies comparing intraoral xeroradiographs and E-speed films.
    Ludlow JB; Hill RA; Hayes CJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 May; 65(5):618-25. PubMed ID: 3163790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Film quality in image intensifier photofluorography.
    Wihed A; Reichmann S
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1981; 22(3A):289-94. PubMed ID: 7315507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. E-speed dental films processed with rapid chemistry: a comparison with D-speed film.
    Kaffe I; Gratt BM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Sep; 64(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 3477753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10522196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. External audit of photon beams by mailed film dosimetry: feasibility study.
    Novotny J; Gomola I; Izewska J; Huyskens D; Dutreix A
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Jul; 42(7):1277-88. PubMed ID: 9253039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Assessment of the quality of radiographic medical films and chemicals for photochemical treatment].
    Larionov VN; Leont'ev VG; Kalashnikova LN
    Med Tekh; 2001; (6):31-4. PubMed ID: 11837193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Image quality and optical density in mammography: study on phantoms].
    Stinés J; Noël A; Estivalet S; Troufléau P; Netter E; Quinquis J
    J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 79(4):331-5. PubMed ID: 9757259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.