These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10677317)

  • 1. Effects of stratification in the analysis of affected-sib-pair data: benefits and costs.
    Leal SM; Ott J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):567-75. PubMed ID: 10677317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of transmission-ratio distortion on allele sharing in affected sibling pairs.
    Greenwood CM; Morgan K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jun; 66(6):2001-4. PubMed ID: 10775526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multilocus linkage tests based on affected relative pairs.
    Cordell HJ; Wedig GC; Jacobs KB; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1273-86. PubMed ID: 10729111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linkage detection adaptive to linkage disequilibrium: the disequilibrium maximum-likelihood-binomial test for affected-sibship data.
    Huang J; Jiang Y
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Dec; 65(6):1741-59. PubMed ID: 10577929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A unified Haseman-Elston method for testing linkage with quantitative traits.
    Xu X; Weiss S; Xu X; Wei LJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Oct; 67(4):1025-8. PubMed ID: 10961909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating linkage and linkage disequilibrium: use of excess sharing and transmission disequilibrium methods in affected sib pairs.
    Wicks J; Wilson SR
    Ann Hum Genet; 2000 Sep; 64(Pt 5):419-32. PubMed ID: 11281280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consanguinity and the sib-pair method: an approach using identity by descent between and within individuals.
    Génin E; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Nov; 59(5):1149-62. PubMed ID: 8900245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A robust identity-by-descent procedure using affected sib pairs: multipoint mapping for complex diseases.
    Liang KY; Chiu YF; Beaty TH
    Hum Hered; 2001; 51(1-2):64-78. PubMed ID: 11096273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of age at onset on the power of the affected sib pair and transmission/disequilibrium tests.
    Li H; Hsu L
    Ann Hum Genet; 2000 May; 64(Pt 3):239-54. PubMed ID: 11246475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1310-27. PubMed ID: 10731466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hidden linkage: a comparison of the affected sib pair (ASP) test and transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT).
    McGinnis RE
    Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Mar; 62(Pt 2):159-79. PubMed ID: 9759477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The power of two-locus affected sib-pair linkage analysis to detect interacting disease loci.
    Hallgrímsdóttir IB; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 32(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 17654608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between the sibling recurrence-risk ratio and genotype relative risk.
    Rybicki BA; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):593-604. PubMed ID: 10677319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal ascertainment strategies to detect linkage to common disease alleles.
    Badner JA; Gershon ES; Goldin LR
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Sep; 63(3):880-8. PubMed ID: 9718337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiency of typing unaffected relatives in an affected-sib-pair linkage study with single-locus and multiple tightly linked markers.
    Holmans P; Clayton D
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Nov; 57(5):1221-32. PubMed ID: 7485174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of disease genes by use of family data. II. Application to nuclear families.
    Tu IP; Balise RR; Whittemore AS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1341-50. PubMed ID: 10739759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing linkage disequilibrium in sibships.
    Siegmund KD; Langholz B; Kraft P; Thomas DC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jul; 67(1):244-8. PubMed ID: 10831398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using identity-by-descent information in affected sib pairs to increase the efficiency of genetic association studies.
    Wicks J; Treloar SA; Martin NG
    Twin Res; 2004 Apr; 7(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 15169605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The transmission/disequilibrium test for linkage on the X chromosome.
    Ho GY; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1158-60. PubMed ID: 10712228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multipoint method for detecting genotyping errors and mutations in sibling-pair linkage data.
    Douglas JA; Boehnke M; Lange K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1287-97. PubMed ID: 10739757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.