These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10677319)

  • 81. Patterns of genetic inheritance.
    Reyna BA; Pickler RH
    Neonatal Netw; 1999 Feb; 18(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 10205467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Epialleles and common disease.
    Peedicayil J
    Med Hypotheses; 2005; 64(1):215. PubMed ID: 15533644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Bayesian fine-scale mapping of disease loci, by hidden Markov models.
    Morris AP; Whittaker JC; Balding DJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jul; 67(1):155-69. PubMed ID: 10835299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Evidence and implications for multiplicative interactions among loci predisposing to human common disease.
    Jones HB; Faham M
    Hum Hered; 2005; 59(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 15942249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Log-linear models for gene mapping with affected sib pair data.
    Yang Y; Ott J
    Hum Hered; 2002; 53(4):227-36. PubMed ID: 12435886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Probability of detection of genotyping errors and mutations as inheritance inconsistencies in nuclear-family data.
    Douglas JA; Skol AD; Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):487-95. PubMed ID: 11791214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Finding genes influencing susceptibility to complex diseases in the post-genome era.
    Rannala B
    Am J Pharmacogenomics; 2001; 1(3):203-21. PubMed ID: 12083968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Power of non-parametric linkage analysis in mapping genes contributing to human longevity in long-lived sib-pairs.
    Tan Q; Zhao JH; Iachine I; Hjelmborg J; Vach W; Vaupel JW; Christensen K; Kruse TA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 26(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 15022210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. The trimmed-haplotype test for linkage disequilibrium.
    MacLean CJ; Martin RB; Sham PC; Wang H; Straub RE; Kendler KS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1062-75. PubMed ID: 10712218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. A survey of affected-sibship statistics for nonparametric linkage analysis.
    Sengul H; Weeks DE; Feingold E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Jul; 69(1):179-90. PubMed ID: 11404816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Power of sib-pair and sib-trio linkage analysis with assortative mating and multiple disease loci.
    Sribney WM; Swift M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1992 Oct; 51(4):773-84. PubMed ID: 1415221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Segregation analysis of esophageal cancer in a moderately high-incidence area of northern China.
    Zhang W; Bailey-Wilson JE; Li W; Wang X; Zhang C; Mao X; Liu Z; Zhou C; Wu M
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jul; 67(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 10841811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Using linkage analysis to detect gene-gene interaction by stratifying family data on known disease, or disease-associated, alleles.
    Corso B; Greenberg DA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93398. PubMed ID: 24690899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Familial recurrence rates and genetic models of multiple sclerosis.
    Lindsey JW
    Am J Med Genet A; 2005 May; 135(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 15809998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Design considerations in a sib-pair study of linkage for susceptibility loci in cancer.
    Kerber RA; Amos CI; Yeap BY; Finkelstein DM; Thomas DC
    BMC Med Genet; 2008 Jul; 9():64. PubMed ID: 18616822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. A robust method for the detection of linkage in familial disease.
    Fishman PM; Suarez B; Hodge SE; Reich T
    Am J Hum Genet; 1978 May; 30(3):308-21. PubMed ID: 677128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. A perspective on epistasis: limits of models displaying no main effect.
    Culverhouse R; Suarez BK; Lin J; Reich T
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):461-71. PubMed ID: 11791213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. The affected sib method. III. Selection and recombination.
    Payami H; Thomson G; Louis EJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Mar; 36(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 6711560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. General epistatic models of the risk of complex diseases.
    Song YS; Wang F; Slatkin M
    Genetics; 2010 Dec; 186(4):1467-73. PubMed ID: 20855570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Down-weighting of multiple affected sib pairs leads to biased likelihood-ratio tests, under the assumption of no linkage.
    Greenwood CM; Bull SB
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Apr; 64(4):1248-52. PubMed ID: 10090918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.