These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comprehensive evaluation of environmental and economic benefits of China's urban underground transportation construction projects. Yang X; Chen Z; Guo D J Environ Biol; 2015 Jul; 36 Spec No():733-44. PubMed ID: 26387347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Process safety management in the pipeline industry: parallels and differences between the pipeline integrity management (IMP) rule of the Office of Pipeline Safety and the PSM/RMP approach for process facilities. DeWolf GB J Hazard Mater; 2003 Nov; 104(1-3):169-92. PubMed ID: 14602408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk management of LPG transport activities in Hong Kong. Boult M J Hazard Mater; 2000 Jan; 71(1-3):85-100. PubMed ID: 10677655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanisms of and facility types involved in hazardous materials incidents. Kales SN; Polyhronopoulos GN; Castro MJ; Goldman RH; Christiani DC Environ Health Perspect; 1997 Sep; 105(9):998-1000. PubMed ID: 9300926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Businesses and advocacy groups create a road map for safer chemicals: the BizNGO Principles for Chemicals Policy. Rossi MS; Thorpe B; Peele C New Solut; 2011; 21(3):387-402. PubMed ID: 22001037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Through ARIPAR-GIS the quantified area risk analysis supports land-use planning activities. Spadoni G; Egidi D; Contini S J Hazard Mater; 2000 Jan; 71(1-3):423-37. PubMed ID: 10677673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodological framework for developing decision support systems (DSS) for hazardous materials emergency response operations. Zografos KG; Vasilakis GM; Giannouli IM J Hazard Mater; 2000 Jan; 71(1-3):503-21. PubMed ID: 10677678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transboundary movement of hazardous wastes into Lebanon: Part 1. The silent trade. Jurdi M J Environ Health; 2002; 64(6):9-14. PubMed ID: 11826629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Redesigning chemicals policy: a very different approach. Geiser K New Solut; 2011; 21(3):329-44. PubMed ID: 22001034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects. Aminbakhsh S; Gunduz M; Sonmez R J Safety Res; 2013 Sep; 46():99-105. PubMed ID: 23932691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PROTEUS, a technical and management model for aquatic risk assessment of industrial spills. Stam GJ; Bottelberghs PH; Post JG; Bos HG J Hazard Mater; 2000 Jan; 71(1-3):439-48. PubMed ID: 10677674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk-informed selection of a highway trajectory in the neighborhood of an oil-refinery. Papazoglou IA; Nivolianitou Z; Aneziris O; Christou MD; Bonanos G J Hazard Mater; 1999 Jun; 67(2):111-44. PubMed ID: 10341298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utilization of accident databases and fuzzy sets to estimate frequency of HazMat transport accidents. Qiao Y; Keren N; Mannan MS J Hazard Mater; 2009 Aug; 167(1-3):374-82. PubMed ID: 19250750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Walking the tightrope: developing a systems approach to balance safety and mobility for an aging society. Marottoli RA; Coughlin JF J Aging Soc Policy; 2011 Oct; 23(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 21985065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 'Worst case' methodology for the initial assessment of societal risk from proposed major accident installations. Carter DA; Hirst IL J Hazard Mater; 2000 Jan; 71(1-3):117-28. PubMed ID: 10677657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]