264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10677886)
1. [Misconduct and fraud in science].
Draml W
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 Dec; 111(24):1007-8. PubMed ID: 10677886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Misconduct in biomedical research].
de Jong JW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jul; 137(28):1408-13. PubMed ID: 8345896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Misconduct in science: does family medicine have a problem?
Berg AO
Fam Med; 1990; 22(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 2182360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Duplicate publication Part 1. Consideration of the issues.
Davidhizar R; Newman Giger J
Nurse Author Ed; 2002; 12(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 12092429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Committee on Publication Ethics flow charts on suspected publication misconduct.
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
Maturitas; 2009 Mar; 62(3):208-24. PubMed ID: 19329007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [A few words concerning the editorial note about the confirmation of plagiarism with regard to eight published articles by Dr. Andrzej Jendryczko].
Wroński M
Wiad Lek; 1998; 51(5-6):306-9. PubMed ID: 9867694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Another plagiarised paper in Preglad Lekarski.
Władysław Sułowicz
Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(11):738. PubMed ID: 10970211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Let scientific misconduct be seen through to prevent it].
Ishøy T; Gyntelberg F
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jan; 165(4):354-5; author reply 355. PubMed ID: 12599806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Special report: taking on the cheats.
Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):258-9. PubMed ID: 15902219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A tale of two citations.
Errami M; Garner H
Nature; 2008 Jan; 451(7177):397-9. PubMed ID: 18216832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
Claxton LD
Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 15652224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A perspective on the handling of duplicate and redundant publications.
Tipton CM
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 Dec; 26(12):1425-6. PubMed ID: 7869872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific integrity. Responding to possible plagiarism.
Long TC; Errami M; George AC; Sun Z; Garner HR
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5919):1293-4. PubMed ID: 19265004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Facing up to fraud.
Nat Mater; 2002 Nov; 1(3):137. PubMed ID: 12618791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethics and scientific publication.
Benos DJ; Fabres J; Farmer J; Gutierrez JP; Hennessy K; Kosek D; Lee JH; Olteanu D; Russell T; Shaikh F; Wang K
Adv Physiol Educ; 2005 Jun; 29(2):59-74. PubMed ID: 15905149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [My explanation concerning the situation regarding articles identified as plagiarism].
Jendryczko A
Wiad Lek; 1998; 51(1-2):103-4. PubMed ID: 9644028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Plagiarism is dishonest and can easily be exposed].
Schroeder TV
Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Sep; 167(37):3479. PubMed ID: 16159453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Reporting of scientific misconduct in health care research].
Klasen EC; Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Aug; 146(35):1622-4. PubMed ID: 12233155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The gray zone: scientific misconduct comes in many shades.
Handelsman J
DNA Cell Biol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):63-4. PubMed ID: 18279120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Self-plagiarized identical publication: mockery of science and a form of reader abuse.
Kanchan T; Menezes RG; Hunnargi SA
Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2009 Jun; 30(2):217. PubMed ID: 19465824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
