BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10678381)

  • 1. A quantitative study of calcium deposition in the aortic wall following Medtronic Freestyle compared with homograft aortic root replacement. A prospective randomized trial.
    Melina G; Rubens MB; Birks EJ; Bizzarri F; Khaghani A; Yacoub MH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jan; 9(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 10678381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rate of progression and functional significance of aortic root calcification after homograft versus freestyle aortic root replacement.
    El-Hamamsy I; Zaki M; Stevens LM; Clark LA; Rubens M; Melina G; Yacoub MH
    Circulation; 2009 Sep; 120(11 Suppl):S269-75. PubMed ID: 19752378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Late outcomes following freestyle versus homograft aortic root replacement: results from a prospective randomized trial.
    El-Hamamsy I; Clark L; Stevens LM; Sarang Z; Melina G; Takkenberg JJ; Yacoub MH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jan; 55(4):368-76. PubMed ID: 20117443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mid-term pattern of survival, hemodynamic performance and rate of complications after medtronic freestyle versus homograft full aortic root replacement: results from a prospective randomized trial.
    Melina G; De Robertis F; Gaer JA; Amrani M; Khaghani A; Yacoub MH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):972-5; discussion 975-6. PubMed ID: 15597592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transvalvular velocities after full aortic root replacement: results from a prospective randomized trial between the homograft and the Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis.
    Melina G; Mitchell A; Amrani M; Khaghani A; Yacoub MH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11(1):54-8; discussion 58-9. PubMed ID: 11843506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of left ventricular function and mass after Medtronic Freestyle versus homograft aortic root replacement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Rajappan K; Melina G; Bellenger NG; Amrani M; Khaghani A; Pennell DJ; Yacoub MH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11(1):60-5; discussion 66. PubMed ID: 11843507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pulmonary autograft versus aortic homograft for aortic valve replacement: interim results from a prospective randomized trial.
    Aklog L; Carr-White GS; Birks EJ; Yacoub MH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):176-88; discussion 188-9. PubMed ID: 10772034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aortic distensibility after aortic root replacement assessed with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Melina G; Rajappan K; Amrani M; Khaghani A; Pennell DJ; Yacoub MH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11(1):67-74; discussion 74. PubMed ID: 11843508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electron beam tomography for cusp calcification in homograft versus Freestyle xenografts.
    Melina G; Rubens MB; Amrani M; Khaghani A; Yacoub MH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 May; 71(5 Suppl):S368-70. PubMed ID: 11388226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional in vivo characterization of calcification in native valves and in Freestyle versus homograft aortic valves.
    Melina G; Horkaew P; Amrani M; Rubens MB; Yacoub MH; Yang GZ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jul; 130(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 15999039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kangaroo versus freestyle stentless bioprostheses in a juvenile sheep model: hemodynamic performance and calcification behavior.
    Neethling WM; Hodge AJ; Glancy R
    J Card Surg; 2005; 20(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 15673407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements.
    O'Brien MF; Harrocks S; Stafford EG; Gardner MA; Pohlner PG; Tesar PJ; Stephens F
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):334-44; discussion 335. PubMed ID: 11380096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative analysis of left ventricular hemodynamics and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement with homografts or mechanical valves.
    Basarir S; Islamoglu F; Ozkisacik E; Atay Y; Boga M; Bakalim T; Ozbaran M; Telli A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jan; 9(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 10678375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of mechanical and biological aortic valve replacement on coronary perfusion: a prospective, randomized study.
    Bakhtiary F; Abolmaali N; Dzemali O; Wittlinger T; Doss M; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jan; 15(1):5-11; discussion 11. PubMed ID: 16480006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Redo aortic root surgery for failure of an aortic homograft is a major technical challenge.
    Joudinaud TM; Baron F; Raffoul R; Pagis B; Vergnat M; Parisot C; Hvass U; Nataf PR
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Jun; 33(6):989-94. PubMed ID: 18328723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repeat right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction using the Medtronic Freestyle porcine aortic root.
    Erez E; Tam VK; Doublin NA; Stakes J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jan; 15(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 16480018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stentless bioprostheses improve postoperative coronary flow more than stented prostheses after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Bakhtiary F; Schiemann M; Dzemali O; Wittlinger T; Doss M; Ackermann H; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 131(4):883-8. PubMed ID: 16580448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Aortic valve/root replacement using a stentless bioprosthesis (Medtronic Freestyle valve)].
    Sato T; Isomura T; Suma H; Horii T; Kobashi T; Kanemitsu H
    Kyobu Geka; 2000 Apr; 53(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 10770057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement in patients over 55 years old with different valve types.
    Ozatik MA; Göl MK; Yildiz U; Göksel S; Yurdakök O; Yavas S; Tufekcioğlu O; Sener E; Tasdemir O
    Med Sci Monit; 2003 Feb; 9(2):CR55-60. PubMed ID: 12601287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Porcine or human stentless valves for aortic valve replacement? Results of a 10-year comparative study.
    Ali A; Lim E; Halstead J; Ashrafian H; Ali Z; Khalpey Z; Theodorou P; Chamageorgakis T; Kumar P; Jackson C; Pepper J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Jul; 12(4):430-5; discussion 435. PubMed ID: 12918841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.