These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10679049)

  • 1. The effect of a methanogen, Methanobrevibacter smithii, on the growth rate, organic acid production, and specific ATP activity of three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria.
    Rychlik JL; May T
    Curr Microbiol; 2000 Mar; 40(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 10679049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Competition for cellulose among three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria under substrate-excess and substrate-limited conditions.
    Shi Y; Odt CL; Weimer PJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1997 Feb; 63(2):734-42. PubMed ID: 9023950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Competition among three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria in the absence or presence of non-cellulolytic bacteria.
    Chen J; Weimer P
    Microbiology (Reading); 2001 Jan; 147(Pt 1):21-30. PubMed ID: 11160797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4.
    Yeoman CJ; Fields CJ; Lepercq P; Ruiz P; Forano E; White BA; Mosoni P
    mBio; 2021 Mar; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 33658330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro bacterial growth and in vivo ruminal microbiota populations associated with bloat in steers grazing wheat forage.
    Min BR; Pinchak WE; Anderson RC; Hume ME
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Oct; 84(10):2873-82. PubMed ID: 16971591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes to study competition between ruminal fibrolytic bacteria: pure-culture studies with cellulose and alkaline peroxide-treated wheat straw.
    Odenyo AA; Mackie RI; Stahl DA; White BA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1994 Oct; 60(10):3697-703. PubMed ID: 7527202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Competition for cellobiose among three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria under substrate-excess and substrate-limited conditions.
    Shi Y; Weimer PJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1997 Feb; 63(2):743-8. PubMed ID: 9023951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Competition between ruminal cellulolytic bacteria for adhesion to cellulose.
    Mosoni P; Fonty G; Gouet P
    Curr Microbiol; 1997 Jul; 35(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 9175559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term defaunation increases the abundance of cellulolytic ruminococci and methanogens but does not affect the bacterial and methanogen diversity in the rumen of sheep.
    Mosoni P; Martin C; Forano E; Morgavi DP
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):783-91. PubMed ID: 21346137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes to study competition between ruminal fibrolytic bacteria: development of probes for Ruminococcus species and evidence for bacteriocin production.
    Odenyo AA; Mackie RI; Stahl DA; White BA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1994 Oct; 60(10):3688-96. PubMed ID: 7527201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnesium requirement of some of the principal rumen cellulolytic bacteria.
    Morales MS; Dehority BA
    Animal; 2014 Sep; 8(9):1427-32. PubMed ID: 24846132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utilization of individual cellodextrins by three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria.
    Shi Y; Weimer PJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1996 Mar; 62(3):1084-8. PubMed ID: 8975600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incorporation of [(15)N] ammonia by the cellulolytic ruminal bacteria Fibrobacter succinogenes BL2, Ruminococcus albus SY3, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens 17.
    Atasoglu C; Newbold CJ; Wallace RJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2001 Jun; 67(6):2819-22. PubMed ID: 11375199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ionized calcium requirement of rumen cellulolytic bacteria.
    Morales MS; Dehority BA
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5079-91. PubMed ID: 19762826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why don't ruminal bacteria digest cellulose faster?
    Weimer PJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1996 Aug; 79(8):1496-502. PubMed ID: 8880475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Production of succinate from glucose, cellobiose, and various cellulosic materials by the ruminal anaerobic bacteria Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus flavefaciens.
    Gokarn RR; Eiteman MA; Martin SA; Eriksson KE
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 1997; 68(1-2):69-80. PubMed ID: 9373931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Invited review: adhesion mechanisms of rumen cellulolytic bacteria.
    Miron J; Ben-Ghedalia D; Morrison M
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Jun; 84(6):1294-309. PubMed ID: 11417686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nitrate decreases ruminal methane production with slight changes to ruminal methanogen composition of nitrate-adapted steers.
    Zhao L; Meng Q; Li Y; Wu H; Huo Y; Zhang X; Zhou Z
    BMC Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):21. PubMed ID: 29554875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on ruminal bacteria that utilize lactate and digest cellulose.
    Callaway ES; Martin SA
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 Sep; 80(9):2035-44. PubMed ID: 9313145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and use of competitive PCR assays for the rumen cellulolytic bacteria: Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus and Ruminococcus flavefaciens.
    Koike S; Kobayashi Y
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2001 Nov; 204(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 11731149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.