169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10680344)
1. Comparing lifetime emissions of natural gas and conventional fuel vehicles: an application of the generalized ANCOVA model.
Deaton ML; Winebrake JJ
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Feb; 50(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 10680344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Emission factors of air pollutants from CNG-gasoline bi-fuel vehicles: Part I. Black carbon.
Wang Y; Xing Z; Xu H; Du K
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Dec; 572():1161-1165. PubMed ID: 27528482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels.
MacLean HL; Lave LB; Lankey R; Joshi S
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Oct; 50(10):1769-79. PubMed ID: 11288305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Alternative Fuel Vehicle Adoption Increases Fleet Gasoline Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions under United States Corporate Average Fuel Economy Policy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards.
Jenn A; Azevedo IM; Michalek JJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Mar; 50(5):2165-74. PubMed ID: 26867100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toxic emissions from mobile sources: a total fuel-cycle analysis for conventional and alternative fuel vehicles.
Winebrake JJ; Wang MQ; He D
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 Jul; 51(7):1073-86. PubMed ID: 15658225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hazardous Air Pollution from Mobile Sources: A Comparison of Alternative Fuel and Reformulated Gasoline Vehicles.
Winebrake JJ; Deaton ML
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 1999 May; 49(5):576-581. PubMed ID: 28072304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits of near-zero freight: The air quality and health impacts of low-NO
Mac Kinnon M; Zhu S; Cervantes A; Dabdub D; Samuelsen GS
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 Nov; 71(11):1428-1444. PubMed ID: 34287106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Real-world fuel use and gaseous emission rates for flex fuel vehicles operated on E85 versus gasoline.
Delavarrafiee M; Frey HC
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Mar; 68(3):235-254. PubMed ID: 29215964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Emission factors of air pollutants from CNG-gasoline bi-fuel vehicles: Part II. CO, HC and NOx.
Huang X; Wang Y; Xing Z; Du K
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Sep; 565():698-705. PubMed ID: 27219504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The London low emission zone baseline study.
Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of mobile air-conditioning on vehicle emissions and fuel consumption: a model approach for modern gasoline cars used in Europe.
Weilenmann MF; Vasic AM; Stettler P; Novak P
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Dec; 39(24):9601-10. PubMed ID: 16475341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variability in the primary emissions and secondary gas and particle formation from vehicles using bioethanol mixtures.
Gramsch E; Papapostolou V; Reyes F; Vásquez Y; Castillo M; Oyola P; López G; Cádiz A; Ferguson S; Wolfson M; Lawrence J; Koutrakis P
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Apr; 68(4):329-346. PubMed ID: 29020572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating the real-world emission characteristics of light-duty gasoline vehicles and their relationship to local socioeconomic conditions in three communities in Los Angeles, California.
Park SS; Vijayan A; Mara SL; Herner JD
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Oct; 66(10):1031-44. PubMed ID: 27268732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in onroad transportation energy and emissions.
Frey HC
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Jun; 68(6):514-563. PubMed ID: 29589998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of environmentally friendly fuel emissions from in-use vehicle exhaust: low-blend iso-stoichiometric GEM mixture as example.
Schifter I; Díaz-Gutiérrez L; Rodríguez-Lara R; González-Macías C; González-Macías U
Environ Monit Assess; 2017 May; 189(5):243. PubMed ID: 28456921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Future methane emissions from the heavy-duty natural gas transportation sector for stasis, high, medium, and low scenarios in 2035.
Clark NN; Johnson DR; McKain DL; Wayne WS; Li H; Rudek J; Mongold RA; Sandoval C; Covington AN; Hailer JT
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Dec; 67(12):1328-1341. PubMed ID: 28829681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the Effects of Aromatics Content in Gasoline on Gaseous and Particulate Matter Emissions from SI-PFI and SIDI Vehicles.
Karavalakis G; Short D; Vu D; Russell R; Hajbabaei M; Asa-Awuku A; Durbin TD
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(11):7021-31. PubMed ID: 25938171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biofuels, vehicle emissions, and urban air quality.
Wallington TJ; Anderson JE; Kurtz EM; Tennison PJ
Faraday Discuss; 2016 Jul; 189():121-36. PubMed ID: 27112132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reactive Nitrogen Species Emission Trends in Three Light-/Medium-Duty United States Fleets.
Bishop GA; Stedman DH
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 49(18):11234-40. PubMed ID: 26322956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Particle and carbon dioxide emissions from passenger vehicles operating on unleaded petrol and LPG fuel.
Ristovski ZD; Jayaratne ER; Morawska L; Ayoko GA; Lim M
Sci Total Environ; 2005 Jun; 345(1-3):93-8. PubMed ID: 15919531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
