These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1068155)

  • 21. Teaching recognition skills to improve products.
    Knight GW; Guenzel PJ; Fitzgerald M
    J Dent Educ; 1990 Dec; 54(12):739-42. PubMed ID: 2246401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improving evaluation of amalgam restorations.
    Salvendy G; Joost MG; Cunningham PR; Ferguson GW; Wilko RA; Dees RW
    J Dent Educ; 1976 Jun; 40(6):368-9. PubMed ID: 1063780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Amalgam obturation of a class V cavity in a molar tooth. 2 key points: retention and shaping].
    Pescarmona G
    Attual Dent; 1985 Nov; 1(27):6-11. PubMed ID: 3914893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of knowledge of the desired outcome on dental motor performance.
    Feil PH; Reed T
    J Dent Educ; 1988 Apr; 52(4):198-201. PubMed ID: 3162737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of reducing frequency of augmented feedback on manual dexterity training and its retention.
    Wierinck E; Puttemans V; van Steenberghe D
    J Dent; 2006 Oct; 34(9):641-7. PubMed ID: 16413652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Survival time of Class II molar restorations in relation to patient and dental health insurance costs for treatment.
    Sjögren P; Halling A
    Swed Dent J; 2002; 26(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 12462873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Acquisition of psychomotor skills in dentistry: an experimental teaching method.
    Vann WF; May KN; Shugars DA
    J Dent Educ; 1981 Sep; 45(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 6943174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The future of dental amalgam].
    Opdam NJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Oct; 112(10):373-5. PubMed ID: 16300323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Approximating class II amalgam restorations for primary molars.
    Hill CJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 1973 Jan; 17(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 4508942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of amalgam bonding on resistance form of Class II amalgam restorations.
    Della Bona A; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 9643242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of preparation design on the resistance for extensive amalgam restorations.
    Plasmans PJ; Kusters ST; Thissen AM; Van'T Hof MA; Vrijhoef MM
    Oper Dent; 1987; 12(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 3473449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study).
    Kamel FM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Clinical evaluation of the amalagam restorations for cavities Class I and Class II. 3: Comparison between dental school and dental institutions in the community].
    Weiland M; Nossek H; Schulz P
    Stomatol DDR; 1990 Apr; 40(4):155-6. PubMed ID: 2270563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acquisition of psychomotor skills in dentistry: a follow-up study.
    Vann WF; Shugars DA; May KN; Holland JC
    J Dent Educ; 1984 Sep; 48(9):514-7. PubMed ID: 6592216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Teaching dental students mirror vision skills.
    Willis DO; Kincheloe JE
    J Dent Educ; 1983 May; 47(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 6575047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.