These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10682204)

  • 1. Associative competition in operant conditioning: blocking the response-reinforcer association.
    Williams BA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Dec; 6(4):618-23. PubMed ID: 10682204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Competition between stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and anticipatory contrast.
    Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 1402603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contingency tracking during unsignaled delayed reinforcement.
    Keely J; Feola T; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Sep; 88(2):229-47. PubMed ID: 17970417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of following an excitatory-inhibitory compound with an intermediate reinforcer.
    Rescorla RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Apr; 28(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 11987873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acquisition of operant behavior in rats with delayed reinforcement: A retractable-lever procedure.
    McNamara AA; Johnson LE; Tate C; Chiang T; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2015 Feb; 111():37-41. PubMed ID: 25464338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Instrumental learning for a thermal reinforcer in 1-day-old rats.
    Flory GS; Langley CM; Pfister JF; Alberts JR
    Dev Psychobiol; 1997 Jan; 30(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 8989531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acquisition of a spatially defined operant with delayed reinforcement.
    Critchfield TS; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Mar; 59(2):373-87. PubMed ID: 8454959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement.
    Lattal KA; Gleeson S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 2303791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Passage of time leaves response-outcome associations intact.
    Colwill RM
    Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 16458454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bidirectional instrumental conditioning.
    Dickinson A; Campos J; Varga ZI; Balleine B
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1996 Nov; 49(4):289-306. PubMed ID: 8962537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations.
    Lieving GA; Reilly MP; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 17002227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transitional and steady-state choice behavior under an adjusting-delay schedule.
    Torres LV; Araújo Sda C; Sanchez CM; Body S; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jan; 95(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 21541116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time left: linear versus logarithmic subjective time.
    Gibbon J; Church RM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Apr; 7(2):87-107. PubMed ID: 7241054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magazine approach during a signal for food depends on Pavlovian, not instrumental, conditioning.
    Harris JA; Andrew BJ; Kwok DW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Apr; 39(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 23421397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conditioned reinforcement value and choice.
    Preston RA; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Mar; 55(2):155-75. PubMed ID: 2037825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in the effect of Pavlovian contingencies upon behavioral momentum using auditory versus visual stimuli.
    Mauro BC; Mace FC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Mar; 65(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 8851539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of signaled-delayed reinforcement: effects of delay-signal duration.
    Schaal DW; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Jan; 53(1):103-21. PubMed ID: 2299283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of the passage of time on the contribution of initial response-outcome associations to instrumental performance.
    Colwill RM
    Behav Processes; 2007 May; 75(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 17321696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Basolateral amygdala lesions and sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude in concurrent chains schedules.
    Helms CM; Mitchell SH
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 191(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 18455812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement: a comparison of two-lever procedures.
    Sutphin G; Byrne T; Poling A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Jan; 69(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 9465411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.