These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10682289)

  • 21. Context switch effects on acquisition and extinction in human predictive learning.
    Rosas JM; Callejas-Aguilera JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):461-74. PubMed ID: 16719659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On splitting and merging categories: a regression account of subadditivity.
    Fiedler K; Unkelbach C; Freytag P
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):383-93. PubMed ID: 19460947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prior belief and polarity in multicue learning.
    Evans JS; Clibbens J; Harris A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 May; 58(4):651-65. PubMed ID: 16104100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effectiveness of feedback in multiple-cue probability learning.
    Newell BR; Weston NJ; Tunney RJ; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):890-908. PubMed ID: 18932062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nothing compares: Unraveling learning task effects in judgment and categorization.
    Trippas D; Pachur T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2239-2266. PubMed ID: 30998071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Frequency of judgment as a context-like determinant of predictive judgments.
    Vadillo MA; Vegas S; Matute H
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1065-75. PubMed ID: 15813490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning.
    Undorf M; Söllner A; Bröder A
    Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):507-519. PubMed ID: 29327336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Associative relationships in human predictive learning.
    Gámez AM; Martos R; Abad MJ; Rosas JM
    Span J Psychol; 2013; 16():E5. PubMed ID: 23866246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Facilitating normative judgments of conditional probability: frequency or nested sets?
    Yamagishi K
    Exp Psychol; 2003; 50(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 12693194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do children profit from looking beyond looks? From similarity-based to cue abstraction processes in multiple-cue judgment.
    von Helversen B; Mata R; Olsson H
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Jan; 46(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 20053019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cue-interaction effects in contingency judgments using the streamed-trial procedure.
    Hannah SD; Crump MJ; Allan LG; Siegel S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Jun; 63(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 19485601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Strategies for revising judgment: how (and how well) people use others' opinions.
    Soll JB; Larrick RP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):780-805. PubMed ID: 19379049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Error discounting in probabilistic category learning.
    Craig S; Lewandowsky S; Little DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 May; 37(3):673-87. PubMed ID: 21355666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of interference produced by conflicting associations in contextual control.
    Nelson JB; Callejas-Aguilera JE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Jul; 33(3):314-26. PubMed ID: 17620029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of construal level on subjective probability estimates.
    Wakslak C; Trope Y
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19076317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Use of the familiarity difference cue in inferential judgments.
    Xu P; González-Vallejo C; Weinhardt J; Chimeli J; Karadogan F
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Feb; 46(2):298-314. PubMed ID: 29067637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation.
    Alter AL; Oppenheimer DM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2009 Aug; 13(3):219-35. PubMed ID: 19638628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. When learning order affects sensitivity to base rates: challenges for theories of causal learning.
    Reips UD; Waldmann MR
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 18271349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of working memory capacity in multiple-cue probability learning.
    Rolison JJ; Evans JS; Walsh CR; Dennis I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1494-514. PubMed ID: 21722064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.