These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10682409)

  • 1. Facial profile and dental changes before, during and after treatment with Hansaplate/Headgear.
    Hansson C; Sköld B; Linder-Aronson S
    J Orofac Orthop; 2000; 61(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 10682409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment of adolescents with Hansaplate/headgear. Influence on face in profile and on dentition.
    Hansson C; Sköld B; Linder-Aronson S
    J Orofac Orthop; 1997 Feb; 58(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 9300836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with maxillary expansion and protraction headgear treatment.
    Ngan P; Hägg U; Yiu C; Merwin D; Wei SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jan; 109(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 8540481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment effects of simple fixed appliance and reverse headgear in correction of anterior crossbites.
    Gu Y; Rabie AB; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 10842112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of the effects of customized facemask therapy or headgear to the lower arch on the developing Class III face.
    Battagel JM; Orton HS
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Dec; 17(6):467-82. PubMed ID: 8682163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sagittal skeletal and dental changes of reverse headgear treatment in Chinese boys with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Chen KF; So LL
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(5):363-72. PubMed ID: 8893106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-phase treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion with the combination of the twin-block appliance and high-pull headgear.
    Lv Y; Yan B; Wang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):246-55. PubMed ID: 22858335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of reverse headgear treatment on sagittal correction in girls born with unilateral complete cleft lip and cleft palate--skeletal and dental changes.
    So LL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Feb; 109(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 8638559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft tissue profile after distal molar movement with a pendulum K-loop appliance versus cervical headgear.
    Polat-Ozsoy O; Gokcelik A; Güngör-Acar A; Kircelli BH
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Mar; 78(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 18251595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition.
    Wieslander L
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Jul; 86(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 6588755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part II--The soft tissues.
    Morris DO; Illing HM; Lee RT
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Dec; 20(6):663-84. PubMed ID: 9926634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial profile changes in early Class II correction with cervical headgear.
    Kirjavainen M; Hurmerinta K; Kirjavainen T
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):960-7. PubMed ID: 18004917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical headgear usage and the bioprogressive orthodontic philosophy.
    Pavlick CT
    Semin Orthod; 1998 Dec; 4(4):219-30. PubMed ID: 10219177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of treatment outcome following correction of anterior crossbites in the mixed dentition: orthodontic versus orthopaedic methods.
    Gu Y
    Aust Orthod J; 2005 May; 21(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 16433078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mandibular cervical headgear in orthopedic and orthodontic treatment of Class III cases.
    Rey D; Aristizabal JF; Oberti G; Angel D
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 16779976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between hard and soft tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions using Edgewise and Fränkel appliance techniques.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):154-65. PubMed ID: 2351200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term soft-tissue response to orthodontic treatment with early cervical headgear--a randomized study.
    Virkkula T; Kantomaa T; Julku J; Pirttiniemi P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):586-96. PubMed ID: 19409341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.