BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10682438)

  • 1. [Ultrasonic measurements of fetal thigh soft tissue thickness in the estimation of fetal weight].
    Han Y; Lin H; Liu Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 May; 33(5):277-9. PubMed ID: 10682438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Correlation between ultrasonographic measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness and selected fetal ultrasonographic and maternal anthropometric parameters].
    Abdalla N; Bachanek M; Kania M; Roguska M; Cendrowski K; Sawicki W
    Ginekol Pol; 2015 Dec; 86(12):915-20. PubMed ID: 26995941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Ultrasonic measurement in the estimation of fetal weight].
    Situ X; Huang X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1997 May; 32(5):299-301. PubMed ID: 9596857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation using head and abdominal circumference and femur length].
    Mladenović-Segedi L; Segedi D
    Med Pregl; 2005; 58(11-12):548-52. PubMed ID: 16673856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal mid-thigh soft-tissue thickness: a novel method for fetal weight estimation.
    Abuelghar W; Khairy A; El Bishry G; Ellaithy M; Abd-Elhamid T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 290(6):1101-8. PubMed ID: 25009072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Ultrasonic multiple measurement estimation of fetal weight in parturient].
    Luo H; Zhou S; Yang T; Liu S; Xu H
    Hua Xi Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2001 Dec; 32(4):618-20. PubMed ID: 12528567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal weight estimation formulas with head, abdominal, femur, and thigh circumference measurements.
    Vintzileos AM; Campbell WA; Rodis JF; Bors-Koefoed R; Nochimson DJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Aug; 157(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 3618691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of fetal weight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness in the late third trimester.
    Scioscia M; Scioscia F; Vimercati A; Caradonna F; Nardelli C; Pinto LR; Selvaggi LE
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 18307214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longitudinal measurement of fetal thigh soft tissue parameters and its role in the prediction of birth weight.
    O'Connor C; Farah N; O'Higgins A; Segurado R; Fitzpatrick C; Turner MJ; Stuart B; Kennelly MM
    Prenat Diagn; 2013 Oct; 33(10):945-51. PubMed ID: 23716034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation of Fractional Limb Volume Measurements with Neonatal Morphometric Indices.
    Cinar HB; Sezik M
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2021; 86(1-2):94-99. PubMed ID: 33472205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Developing parameters for predicting macrosomia].
    Liang JZ; Xiao B; Li H; Zhuang L
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2008 Jul; 39(4):635-7. PubMed ID: 18798512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Estimation of fetal weight on the basis of neural network].
    Wu J; Yang T; Lin J; Luo H; Li D; Wang T; Zheng C
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 22(5):922-5, 929. PubMed ID: 16294722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening efficacy of the subcutaneous tissue width/femur length ratio for fetal macrosomia in the non-diabetic pregnancy.
    Rotmensch S; Celentano C; Liberati M; Malinger G; Sadan O; Bellati U; Glezerman M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 13(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 10380299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
    Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Studies on individual fetal weight estimation by ultrasonography in multiple pregnancies].
    Tsuzaki T; Takeuchi K; Ida T; Minagawa Y; Maeda K
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Apr; 38(4):520-8. PubMed ID: 3517198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study of accuracy of commonly used fetal parameters for estimation of gestational age.
    Karki DB; Sharmqa UK; Rauniyar RK
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2006; 45(162):233-7. PubMed ID: 17189967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur.
    Johnsen SL; Wilsgaard T; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):172-85. PubMed ID: 16289532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight].
    Shalev E; Nasar H; Ben-Ami M; Romano S; Weiner E
    Harefuah; 1991 May; 120(9):506-9. PubMed ID: 1937230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of fetal weight estimation formulas with and without head measurements.
    Warsof SL; Wolf P; Coulehan J; Queenan JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Apr; 67(4):569-73. PubMed ID: 3515257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regression formula for estimation of fetal weight with use of abdominal circumference and femur length: a prospective study.
    Ferrero A; Maggi E; Giancotti A; Torcia F; Pachì A
    J Ultrasound Med; 1994 Nov; 13(11):823-33. PubMed ID: 7837327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.