These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10682467)

  • 1. [Cervical ripening score by transperineal ultrasonography and its predictive effect for induction of labor by prostaglandin E2].
    Li Q; Zhang J; You Z
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Apr; 33(4):216-8. PubMed ID: 10682467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score.
    Gonen R; Degani S; Ron A
    Eur J Ultrasound; 1998 Aug; 7(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 9700213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The value of the cervical score in predicting successful outcome of labor induction.
    Williams MC; Krammer J; O'Brien WF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):784-9. PubMed ID: 9351765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison study on transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement and cytokine in prediction of the cervical ripening and the onset time of term labor].
    Jian L; Mu X; Wu W
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 37(12):708-11. PubMed ID: 12622909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.
    Eggebø TM; Heien C; Økland I; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in cervical nitric oxide concentration correlate with Bishop score and cervical length modifications in prostaglandin E2-mediated induction of labor.
    Chiossi G; Verocchi G; Venturini P; Facchinetti F
    J Soc Gynecol Investig; 2006 Apr; 13(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 16638591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction.
    Gómez Laencina AM; Sánchez FG; Gimenez JH; Martínez MS; Valverde Martínez JA; Vizcaíno VM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 17611824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score.
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Chastang C; Ville Y
    BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 15663583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction.
    Uyar Y; Erbay G; Demir BC; Baytur Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 19130065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
    Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Factors predicting unsuccessful labor induction with dinoprostone in post-term pregnancy with unfavorable cervix].
    Ducarme G; Chesnoy V; Petit L
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Jan; 44(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 24239036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of the predictive value of digital examination (Bishop's score) and ultrasound evaluation for labor induction success].
    Sieroszewski P; Banach R
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Feb; 81(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 20232707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Ultrasonographic score for predicting vaginal delivery within 24h of induction: a pilot study].
    Ancel J; Huissoud C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Mar; 43(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 25727164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Obesity and cervical ripening failure risk.
    Gauthier T; Mazeau S; Dalmay F; Eyraud JL; Catalan C; Marin B; Aubard Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Mar; 25(3):304-7. PubMed ID: 21574901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound assessment of the cervix for the prediction of successful induction of labor with prostaglandin in prolonged pregnancy.
    Rovas L; Sladkevicius P; Strobel E; Valentin L
    J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Jul; 24(7):933-9. PubMed ID: 15972707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The cervical ripening score by trans-perineum ultrasound].
    Chang C; Zhang Y; Wang C
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1995 Oct; 30(10):600-2. PubMed ID: 8745506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction].
    Gomes F; Ramalho C; Machado AP; Calado E; Cardoso F; Montenegro N
    Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Tenore JL
    Am Fam Physician; 2003 May; 67(10):2123-8. PubMed ID: 12776961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents.
    Fletcher H; Mitchell S; Frederick J; Simeon D; Brown D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 8290188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.