128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10682687)
1. Reducing DCO registrations through electronic matching of cancer registry data and routine hospital data.
Pollock AM; Vickers N
Br J Cancer; 2000 Feb; 82(3):712-7. PubMed ID: 10682687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact on colorectal cancer survival of cases registered by 'death certificate only': implications for national survival rates.
Pollock AM; Vickers N
Br J Cancer; 1994 Dec; 70(6):1229-31. PubMed ID: 7981082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Why are a quarter of all cancer deaths in south-east England registered by death certificate only? Factors related to death certificate only registrations in the Thames Cancer Registry between 1987 and 1989.
Pollock AM; Vickers N
Br J Cancer; 1995 Mar; 71(3):637-41. PubMed ID: 7880750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why did treatment rates for colorectal cancer in south east England fall between 1982 and 1988? The effect of case ascertainment and registration bias.
Pollock AM; Benster R; Vickers N
J Public Health Med; 1995 Dec; 17(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 8639341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proportion of Death Certificate Only Cases and Its Related Factors, Kwangju Cancer Registry (KCR).
Lee SJ; Shin MH; Kim SY; Park KS; Kim YJ; Hwang TJ; Choi JS
Cancer Res Treat; 2001 Dec; 33(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 26680831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of data of the Thames cancer registry on 673 cases of colorectal cancer: effect of the registration process.
Pollock AM; Vickers N
Qual Health Care; 1995 Sep; 4(3):184-9. PubMed ID: 10153427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduction of Death Certificate Only (DCO) Registrations by Active Follow Back.
Turano L; Laudico A; Esteban D; Pisani P; Parkin D
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2002; 3(2):133-135. PubMed ID: 12718591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interpreting international comparisons of cancer survival: the effects of incomplete registration and the presence of death certificate only cases on survival estimates.
Robinson D; Sankila R; Hakulinen T; Møller H
Eur J Cancer; 2007 Mar; 43(5):909-13. PubMed ID: 17300929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does exclusion of cancers registered only from death-certificate information diminish socio-demographic disparities in recorded survival?
Tervonen HE; Roder D; Morrell S; You H; Currow DC
Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 48():70-77. PubMed ID: 28419901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Index for evaluating completeness of registration in population-based cancer registries and estimation of registration rate at the Osaka Cancer Registry between 1966 and 1992 using this index].
Ajiki W; Tsukuma H; Oshima A
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1998 Oct; 45(10):1011-7. PubMed ID: 9893469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determinants and interpretation of death certificate only proportions in the initial years of newly established cancer registries.
Brenner H; Jansen L
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Mar; 49(4):931-7. PubMed ID: 23084081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethnicity coding in a regional cancer registry and in Hospital Episode Statistics.
Jack RH; Linklater KM; Hofman D; Fitzpatrick J; Møller H
BMC Public Health; 2006 Nov; 6():281. PubMed ID: 17096838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Relationship of proportion of DCO cases in cancer registration to gastric cancer screening participation rate and proportion of all referred inpatients diagnosed with neoplasm].
Nagai Y; Koinuma N
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1993 Jul; 40(7):567-70. PubMed ID: 8369534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Restriction to period of interest improves informative value of death certificate only proportions in period analysis of cancer survival.
Brenner H; Jansen L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1432-9. PubMed ID: 25881488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Death certificate only proportions should be age adjusted in studies comparing cancer survival across populations and over time.
Brenner H; Castro FA; Eberle A; Emrich K; Holleczek B; Katalinic A; Jansen L;
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Jan; 52():102-8. PubMed ID: 26682869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Completeness of case ascertainment and survival time error in English cancer registries: impact on 1-year survival estimates.
Møller H; Richards S; Hanchett N; Riaz SP; Lüchtenborg M; Holmberg L; Robinson D
Br J Cancer; 2011 Jun; 105(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 21559016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variation, precision and validity of 1-year survival estimates for lung, breast, colon and prostate cancer in South East England primary care trusts.
Lake J; Mak V; Møller H; Davies EA
Public Health; 2012 Jan; 126(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 22153886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Italian cancer figures, report 2012: Cancer in children and adolescents.
; ;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(1 Suppl 1):1-225. PubMed ID: 23585445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Data quality in population-based cancer registration: an assessment of the Merseyside and Cheshire Cancer Registry.
Seddon DJ; Williams EM
Br J Cancer; 1997; 76(5):667-74. PubMed ID: 9303369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A mixed linear model controlling for case underascertainment across multiple cancer registries estimated time trends in survival.
Dahm S; Bertz J; Barnes B; Kraywinkel K
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 May; 97():111-121. PubMed ID: 29329676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
