These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10682777)

  • 1. Optimized diagnostic angiography in high-risk patients with severe peripheral vascular disease.
    Gates J; Hartnell GG
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 10682777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Kreitner KF; Kalden P; Neufang A; Düber C; Krummenauer F; Küstner E; Laub G; Thelen M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):171-9. PubMed ID: 10628475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with extra-large fields using a computed radiography system in evaluating peripheral vascular disease.
    Hasuo K; Mizushima A; Mihara F; Hashiguchi N; Murayama S; Uchino A; Matsumoto S; Gibo M; Torii Y; Komori K; Masuda K
    Radiat Med; 1996; 14(5):229-33. PubMed ID: 8988500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lower extremity angiography: improved image quality and outflow vessel detection with bilaterally antegrade selective digital subtraction angiography. A blinded prospective intraindividual comparison with aortic flush digital subtraction angiography.
    Jacob AL; Stock KW; Proske M; Steinbrich W
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Apr; 31(4):184-93. PubMed ID: 8721957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Arterial imaging in patients with lower extremity ischemia and diabetes mellitus.
    Pomposelli F
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Sep; 52(3 Suppl):81S-91S. PubMed ID: 20804938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of bolus chasing and static digital subtraction arteriography in peripheral vascular disease.
    Ashleigh RJ; Hufton AP; Razzaq R; MacDiarmaid-Gordon L
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Aug; 73(872):819-24. PubMed ID: 11026855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Digital subtraction angiography of the coronary artery: evaluation of morphological aspects].
    Matsunaga N; Hayashi K; Uetani M; Aikawa H; Hombo Z; Imamura T
    J Cardiol Suppl; 1987; 15():41-8. PubMed ID: 3334253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peripheral vascular disease: evaluation with stepping DSA and conventional screen-film angiography.
    Malden ES; Picus D; Vesely TM; Darcy MD; Hicks ME
    Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 8134562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography: comparison with conventional hepatic arteriography.
    Flannigan BD; Gomes AS; Stambuk EC; Lois JF; Pais SO
    Radiology; 1983 Jul; 148(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 6856829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lower extremity: nonstepping digital angiography with photostimulable imaging plates versus conventional angiography.
    Therasse E; Soulez G; Roy P; Gauvin A; Oliva VL; Carrier R; Robillard P
    Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):695-703. PubMed ID: 9609892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in diagnostic arteriography.
    Kaufman SL; Chang R; Kadir S; Mitchell SE; White RI
    Radiology; 1984 May; 151(2):323-7. PubMed ID: 6369390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
    Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography.
    Meissner OA; Verrel F; Tató F; Siebert U; Ramirez H; Ruppert V; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1269-77. PubMed ID: 15525747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Work in progress. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography: evaluation in 150 patients.
    Davis PC; Hoffman JC
    Radiology; 1983 Jul; 148(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 6344139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MR angiography of infrapopliteal arteries in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease by using Gadofosveset at 3.0 T: diagnostic accuracy compared with selective DSA.
    Bonel HM; Saar B; Hoppe H; Keo HH; Husmann M; Nikolaou K; Ludwig K; Szucs-Farkas Z; Srivastav S; Kickuth R
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):879-90. PubMed ID: 19864508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Misinterpretations in arteriography of the lower extremities].
    Hüttenmoser B; Enzler M; Bino M; Brunner U
    Helv Chir Acta; 1993 Sep; 60(1-2):141-4. PubMed ID: 8226042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital subtraction angiography versus standard contrast arteriography in evaluation of peripheral vascular disease.
    Skau T; Bolin T; Karner G
    Int Angiol; 1988; 7(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 3290359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Peripheral venous and peripheral arterial digital subtraction angiography in occlusive diseases of the lower extremity].
    Triller J; Jegge P; Fritschy P; Fuchs WA
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1987 Mar; 7(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 3552371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities: standard-dose vs. high-dose gadodiamide injection.
    Krause U; Kroencke T; Spielhaupter E; Taupitz M; Kenn W; Hamm B; Hahn D
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 21(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15778953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.