These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography: comparison with conventional hepatic arteriography. Flannigan BD; Gomes AS; Stambuk EC; Lois JF; Pais SO Radiology; 1983 Jul; 148(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 6856829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lower extremity: nonstepping digital angiography with photostimulable imaging plates versus conventional angiography. Therasse E; Soulez G; Roy P; Gauvin A; Oliva VL; Carrier R; Robillard P Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):695-703. PubMed ID: 9609892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in diagnostic arteriography. Kaufman SL; Chang R; Kadir S; Mitchell SE; White RI Radiology; 1984 May; 151(2):323-7. PubMed ID: 6369390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions. Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography. Meissner OA; Verrel F; Tató F; Siebert U; Ramirez H; Ruppert V; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1269-77. PubMed ID: 15525747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Work in progress. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography: evaluation in 150 patients. Davis PC; Hoffman JC Radiology; 1983 Jul; 148(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 6344139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR angiography of infrapopliteal arteries in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease by using Gadofosveset at 3.0 T: diagnostic accuracy compared with selective DSA. Bonel HM; Saar B; Hoppe H; Keo HH; Husmann M; Nikolaou K; Ludwig K; Szucs-Farkas Z; Srivastav S; Kickuth R Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):879-90. PubMed ID: 19864508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Misinterpretations in arteriography of the lower extremities]. Hüttenmoser B; Enzler M; Bino M; Brunner U Helv Chir Acta; 1993 Sep; 60(1-2):141-4. PubMed ID: 8226042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital subtraction angiography versus standard contrast arteriography in evaluation of peripheral vascular disease. Skau T; Bolin T; Karner G Int Angiol; 1988; 7(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 3290359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Peripheral venous and peripheral arterial digital subtraction angiography in occlusive diseases of the lower extremity]. Triller J; Jegge P; Fritschy P; Fuchs WA Digitale Bilddiagn; 1987 Mar; 7(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 3552371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities: standard-dose vs. high-dose gadodiamide injection. Krause U; Kroencke T; Spielhaupter E; Taupitz M; Kenn W; Hamm B; Hahn D J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 21(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15778953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]