These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10682892)

  • 1. Implementing clinical preventive medicine: time to fish or cut bait.
    Frame PS
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 2000; 13(1):84-5. PubMed ID: 10682892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survey finds more physicians emphasizing early detection.
    Steele JA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1990 May; 82(9):737. PubMed ID: 2325144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammography and clinical breast examinations among women aged 50 years and older--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1992.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1993 Oct; 42(38):737-41. PubMed ID: 8371707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delivery of cancer screening: how important is the preventive health examination?
    Fenton JJ; Cai Y; Weiss NS; Elmore JG; Pardee RE; Reid RJ; Baldwin LM
    Arch Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 167(6):580-5. PubMed ID: 17389289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age-related accuracy of screening mammography: how should it be measured?
    Feig SA
    Radiology; 2000 Mar; 214(3):633-40. PubMed ID: 10715022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mammography and clinical breast examinations among women aged 50 years and older--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1992.
    JAMA; 1993 Oct; 270(15):1792-3. PubMed ID: 8411512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examination of population-wide trends in barriers to cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective (1987-2000).
    Finney Rutten LJ; Nelson DE; Meissner HI
    Prev Med; 2004 Mar; 38(3):258-68. PubMed ID: 14766107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Receipt of mammography recommendations among White and non-White women before and after the 2009 United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendation change.
    Gonzales FA; Taplin SH; Yu M; Breen N; Cronin KA
    Cancer Causes Control; 2016 Aug; 27(8):977-87. PubMed ID: 27351918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variation in screening mammography and Papanicolaou smear by primary care physician specialty and gatekeeper plan (United States).
    Haggstrom DA; Phillips KA; Liang SY; Haas JS; Tye S; Kerlikowske K
    Cancer Causes Control; 2004 Nov; 15(9):883-92. PubMed ID: 15577290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationships between level of disability and receipt of preventive health services.
    Diab ME; Johnston MV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 May; 85(5):749-57. PubMed ID: 15129399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stat bite: Frequency of breast cancer screening by health plan, 2000-2003.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Nov; 96(22):1657. PubMed ID: 15547177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.
    Smith-Bindman R; Chu PW; Miglioretti DL; Sickles EA; Blanks R; Ballard-Barbash R; Bobo JK; Lee NC; Wallis MG; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
    JAMA; 2003 Oct; 290(16):2129-37. PubMed ID: 14570948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal recall rates following mammography.
    Goodson WH
    JAMA; 2004 Feb; 291(7):821-2; author reply 822. PubMed ID: 14970059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cancer prevention and early detection efforts continue to make strides.
    Printz C
    Cancer; 2011 Oct; 117(20):4574-5. PubMed ID: 23162871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of mammography services by women enrolled in Medicare--United States, 1991-1993.
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1995 Dec; 9(12):1287-8, 1300. PubMed ID: 8771103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammography and the risks of engagement.
    Pentecost MJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Nov; 1(11):797-9. PubMed ID: 17411707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening mammography: controversies and headlines.
    Jackson VP
    Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):323-6. PubMed ID: 12409561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammography Screening in a Large Health System Following the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations and the Affordable Care Act.
    Nelson HD; Weerasinghe R; Wang L; Grunkemeier G
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131903. PubMed ID: 26121485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DMIST results: technologic or observer variability?
    Kopans DB; Pisano ED; Acharyya S; Hendrick RE; Yaffe MJ; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Bassett LW; Baum JK; Gatsonis CA
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):703; author reply 703. PubMed ID: 18641262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time trends in breast cancer screening rates in the OECD countries.
    Saika K; Sobue T
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2011 Apr; 41(4):591-2. PubMed ID: 21447696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.