These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10683038)

  • 1. Judgment by peers.
    James PF
    Lancet; 2000 Feb; 355(9203):580. PubMed ID: 10683038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review: Does it matter?
    Elwood TW
    J Allied Health; 2011; 40(2):55. PubMed ID: 21695363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A review of peer review by peers.
    Heinemann MK
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Dec; 61(8):649-50. PubMed ID: 24323666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three cheers for peers.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peers review, editors decide, and then, what?
    Schachat AP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):677-8. PubMed ID: 17386274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On judgment, impact factor and feelings: what can we learn from the impact factor?
    Fatović-Ferencić S
    Croat Med J; 2004 Jun; 45(3):344-5. PubMed ID: 15190920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peers under pressure.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):102-4. PubMed ID: 11557944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. To peer review or not to peer review: that seems to be the question.
    Stanley RJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1101. PubMed ID: 16400751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternative peer review system: Peer agreement system.
    Loonen MP
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1931-2. PubMed ID: 20381440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review warts and all.
    Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):679. PubMed ID: 15280874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In praise of peer reviewers and the peer review process.
    Peternelj-Taylor C
    J Forensic Nurs; 2010; 6(4):159-61. PubMed ID: 21114756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review--how does it work?
    Newman N
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 1994; 12(1):3. PubMed ID: 7786454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review of manuscripts for biomedical journals.
    Legendre AM
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1995 Jul; 207(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 7601688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spotlight on "peer-review": the noble foundation of scientific research.
    Bhandari S
    Indian Heart J; 2008; 60(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 19218730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review--reject, accept, or major revision?
    Lancet Neurol; 2003 Sep; 2(9):517. PubMed ID: 12941568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to avoid "unblinding" the peer review process.
    Krinsky G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1474. PubMed ID: 10350273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review: is the process broken?
    Berquist TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):243. PubMed ID: 22826383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review and the nursing literature.
    Dougherty MC
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rigor of peer review and the standing of a journal.
    Tobin MJ
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2002 Oct; 166(8):1013-4. PubMed ID: 12379538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Peer review: the all-seeing eye].
    Offerhaus L
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Nov; 137(45):2331-3. PubMed ID: 8255342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.