318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10683220)
1. Advantages of reusable accessories.
Wolfsen HC
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 10683220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Overview of the problem: reprocessing versus disposal of endoscopic accessories.
Raltz SL; Kozarek RA
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):329-39. PubMed ID: 10683218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advantages of disposable endoscopic accessories.
Petersen BT
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 10683219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reusable biopsy forceps: a cost-effective measure for the endoscopy suite.
Raltz SL; Kozarek RA; Pethigal PA; Moorhouse MA; Merriam LD
Gastroenterol Nurs; 1995; 18(5):167-70. PubMed ID: 7578296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biopsy forceps: reusable or disposable?
Fireman Z
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Jul; 21(7):1089-92. PubMed ID: 16824057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methodology of reprocessing one-time use accessories.
Wilcox CM
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):379-84. PubMed ID: 10683222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Third-party reprocessing of endoscopic accessories.
Furman PJ
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 10683223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness and safety of reusable tracheal suction tubes.
Nanta P; Senarat W; Tribuddharat C; Danchaivijitr S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Dec; 88 Suppl 10():S86-8. PubMed ID: 16850647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reutilization of accessories in gastrointestinal endoscopic practice.
Haber G
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2000 Oct; 15 Suppl():G86-9. PubMed ID: 11101000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Durability and function of disposable versus reusable laparoscopic instrumentation.
Bessell JR; Patkin M; Isabel L
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):143-6. PubMed ID: 7552132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reprocessing of reusable medical devices.
Malchesky PS; Chamberlain VC; Scott-Conner C; Salis B; Wallace C
ASAIO J; 1995; 41(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 7640417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reprocessing of endoscopic accessories reusable, disposable, or reposable.
Kozarek RA
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2000; 63(2):145-6. PubMed ID: 10925448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reuse of disposables: is it worth the risk?
Spanton G
Can Oper Room Nurs J; 1997 Dec; 15(4):28-30. PubMed ID: 9526311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risky recycling: that "disposable" catheter may have been used before.
Hawkins D
US News World Rep; 1999 Sep; 127(11):62-4, 66-7. PubMed ID: 10621509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Methodology of reprocessing reusable accessories.
Alfa MJ
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):361-78. PubMed ID: 10683221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Products liability implications of reprocessing and reuse of single-use medical devices.
Hogan JM; Colonna TE
Food Drug Law J; 1998; 53(3):385-402. PubMed ID: 10346717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The precautionary principle: what is the risk of reusing disposable drops in routine ophthalmology consultations and what are the costs of reducing this risk to zero?
Somner JE; Cavanagh DJ; Wong KK; Whitelaw M; Thomson T; Mansfield D
Eye (Lond); 2010 Feb; 24(2):361-3. PubMed ID: 19521427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: disposable and reusable instruments.
Lau H
Surg Technol Int; 2006; 15():109-15. PubMed ID: 17029170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing the cost of reusable and disposable packs.
MacLean C
Mater Manag Health Care; 1994 Feb; 3(2):24-6, 28. PubMed ID: 10131599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
