These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10683450)

  • 21. Depth from binocular rivalry without spatial disparity.
    Howard IP
    Perception; 1995; 24(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 7617419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of depth, eccentricity and size of additional static stimulus on visually induced self-motion perception.
    Nakamura S
    Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(15):2344-53. PubMed ID: 16516260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamouflage.
    Brooks KR; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 16054190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of monocularly visible regions in depth and surface perception.
    Harris JM; Wilcox LM
    Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(22):2666-85. PubMed ID: 19577589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 3D flash lag illusion.
    Ishii M; Seekkuarachchi H; Tamura H; Tang Z
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(17):1981-4. PubMed ID: 15149831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contribution of disparity to the perception of 3D shape as revealed by bistability of stereoscopic Necker cubes.
    Erkelens CJ
    Seeing Perceiving; 2012; 25(6):561-76. PubMed ID: 23550365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Illusory depth induced by binocular torsional misalignment.
    Mitsudo H
    Vision Res; 2007 May; 47(10):1303-14. PubMed ID: 17412388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The stroboscopic Pulfrich effect is not evidence for the joint encoding of motion and depth.
    Read JC; Cumming BG
    J Vis; 2005 May; 5(5):417-34. PubMed ID: 16097873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Localization of monocular stimuli in different depth planes.
    Shimono K; Tam WJ; Asakura N; Ohmi M
    Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(20):2631-41. PubMed ID: 16005487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of binocular stereopsis in monoptic depth perception.
    Wilcox LM; Harris JM; McKee SP
    Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(18):2367-77. PubMed ID: 17651780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Where do the eyes really go in the hollow-face illusion?
    Grosjean M; Rinkenauer G; Jainta S
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e44706. PubMed ID: 22962623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Monocular depth effects on perceptual fading.
    Hsu LC; Kramer P; Yeh SL
    Vision Res; 2010 Aug; 50(17):1649-55. PubMed ID: 20580732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Depth capture and transparency of regions bounded by illusory and chromatic contours.
    Watanabe T; Cavanagh P
    Vision Res; 1992 Mar; 32(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 1604839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information.
    Bradshaw MF; Parton AD; Glennerster A
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(27):3725-34. PubMed ID: 11090665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Seeing in 3-d with just one eye: stereopsis without binocular vision.
    Vishwanath D; Hibbard PB
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1673-85. PubMed ID: 23892232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bi-stability in perceived slant when binocular disparity and monocular perspective specify different slants.
    van Ee R; van Dam LC; Erkelens CJ
    J Vis; 2002; 2(9):597-607. PubMed ID: 12678631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stereo and motion disparities interfere with positional averaging.
    Harris JM; Morgan MJ
    Vision Res; 1993 Feb; 33(3):309-12. PubMed ID: 8447103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Illusory differences which are stereoacuity test cues.
    Larson WL
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1985 Jun; 62(6):413-7. PubMed ID: 4014429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Temporal aspects of spatial interactions affecting stereo-matching solutions.
    Zhang ZL; Cantor C; Ghose T; Schor CM
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(27):3183-92. PubMed ID: 15482804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.