These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10683591)
1. Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. Prescott RJ; Counsell CE; Gillespie WJ; Grant AM; Russell IT; Kiauka S; Colthart IR; Ross S; Shepherd SM; Russell D Health Technol Assess; 1999; 3(20):1-143. PubMed ID: 10683591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Challenges in creating a good randomized controlled trial in hand surgery. Thoma A Clin Plast Surg; 2005 Oct; 32(4):563-73, vii. PubMed ID: 16139629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fables or foibles: inherent problems with RCTs. Rosner A J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Sep; 26(7):460-7. PubMed ID: 12975633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery. Carney S Int J Surg; 2007 Dec; 5(6):376. PubMed ID: 18063433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Larger effect sizes were associated with higher quality ratings in complementary and alternative medicine randomized controlled trials. Bausell RB; Lee WL; Soeken KL; Li YF; Berman BM J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 May; 57(5):438-46. PubMed ID: 15196613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost data for individual patients included in clinical studies: no amount of statistical analysis can compensate for inadequate costing methods. Graves N; Walker D; Raine R; Hutchings A; Roberts JA Health Econ; 2002 Dec; 11(8):735-9. PubMed ID: 12457373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical appraisal. 5. Randomised controlled trials: questions for valid evidence. Nelson EA NT Learn Curve; 1999 Jul; 3(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 10795227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Quality of methodology and reporting of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for obesity]. Liu XM; Zhang MM; Du L Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2004 Apr; 26(2):192-4. PubMed ID: 15171560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Compliance with the CONSORT checklist in obstetric anaesthesia randomised controlled trials. Halpern SH; Darani R; Douglas MJ; Wight W; Yee J Int J Obstet Anesth; 2004 Oct; 13(4):207-14. PubMed ID: 15477048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: the way forward. Tiruvoipati R; Balasubramanian SP; Atturu G; Peek GJ; Elbourne D J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 16872940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? Poolman RW; Struijs PA; Krips R; Sierevelt IN; Lutz KH; Bhandari M BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16965628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. Otwombe KN; Ogutu B East Afr Med J; 2002 Jul; 79(7):394-6. PubMed ID: 12638837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Trend in methodological quality of randomised clinical trials in low back pain. Koes BW; Malmivaara A; van Tulder MW Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol; 2005 Aug; 19(4):529-39. PubMed ID: 15949774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]