These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10684003)

  • 1. [Effects of surface roughness of two restorative materials on early Streptococcus sanguis adhesion in vitro].
    Gao N; Chai F; Liu G; Xiao X; Zhu Z; Liu Y
    Hua Xi Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 1998 Jun; 29(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 10684003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Streptococcal adherence on various restorative materials.
    Satou J; Fukunaga A; Satou N; Shintani H; Okuda K
    J Dent Res; 1988 Mar; 67(3):588-91. PubMed ID: 3170897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.
    Aykent F; Yondem I; Ozyesil AG; Gunal SK; Avunduk MC; Ozkan S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Initial in vitro bacterial adhesion on dental restorative materials.
    Kim HY; Yeo IS; Lee JB; Kim SH; Kim DJ; Han JS
    Int J Artif Organs; 2012 Oct; 35(10):773-79. PubMed ID: 23065885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of surface properties of polymer-based restorative materials on early adhesion of Streptococcus mutans in vitro.
    Yuan C; Wang X; Gao X; Chen F; Liang X; Li D
    J Dent; 2016 Nov; 54():33-40. PubMed ID: 27452343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adhesion of Streptococcus sanguinis to dental implant and restorative materials in vitro.
    Hauser-Gerspach I; Kulik EM; Weiger R; Decker EM; Von Ohle C; Meyer J
    Dent Mater J; 2007 May; 26(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 17694745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of the surface roughness of porcelain on the adhesion of oral Streptococcus mutans.
    Al-Marzok MI; Al-Azzawi HJ
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E017-24. PubMed ID: 20020077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
    Barnes CM; Covey D; Watanabe H; Simetich B; Schulte JR; Chen H
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adherence of oral streptococci to composite resin restorative materials.
    Yamamoto K; Noda H; Kimura K
    J Dent; 1989 Oct; 17(5):225-9. PubMed ID: 2621272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bacterial viability on surface-modified resin-based dental restorative materials.
    Rüttermann S; Bergmann N; Beikler T; Raab WH; Janda R
    Arch Oral Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(11):1512-21. PubMed ID: 22673754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation of the effect of scaling-induced surface roughness on bacterial adhesion in common fixed dental restorative materials.
    Checketts MR; Turkyilmaz I; Asar NV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1265-70. PubMed ID: 24831748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The study of precedent subgingival flora colonization on four kinds of crown and bridge restorative materials].
    Gao N; Zhao Y; Xiao X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1998 Feb; 16(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 12078179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific surface roughness values for resin based materials.
    Grossman ES; Rosen M; Cleaton-Jones PE; Volchansky A
    SADJ; 2004 Aug; 59(7):274, 276, 278-9. PubMed ID: 15537027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins.
    Mei L; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; Ren Y
    Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 21524789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oral bacterial attachment to titanium surfaces: a scanning electron microscopy study.
    Wu-Yuan CD; Eganhouse KJ; Keller JC; Walters KS
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 8699514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro attachment of Streptococcus sanguis to the dentin of the root canal.
    Calas P; Rochd T; Michel G
    J Endod; 1994 Feb; 20(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 8006568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lack of correlation between fibrils, hydrophobicity and adhesion for strains of Streptococcus sanguis biotypes I and II.
    Wyatt JE; Hesketh LM; Handley PS
    Microbios; 1987; 50(202):7-15. PubMed ID: 2885724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of protease on cell surface structure, hydrophobicity and adhesion of tufted strains of Streptococcus sanguis biotypes I and II.
    Hesketh LM; Wyatt JE; Handley PS
    Microbios; 1987; 50(204-205):131-45. PubMed ID: 3302619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials.
    Avsar A; Yuzbasioglu E; Sarac D
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 26768641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.