These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10684384)

  • 1. Local lymph node assay: validation assessment for regulatory purposes.
    Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Lea LJ; Basketter DA
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Mar; 11(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 10684384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.
    Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    Methods; 2007 Jan; 41(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16938465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nothing is perfect, not even the local lymph node assay: a commentary and the implications for REACH.
    Basketter DA; McFadden JF; Gerberick F; Cockshott A; Kimber I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Feb; 60(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 19207375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The local lymph node assay: status of validation.
    Chamberlain M; Basketter DA
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 Oct; 34(10):999-1002. PubMed ID: 9012775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of metal allergens in the local lymph node assay.
    Basketter DA; Lea LJ; Cooper KJ; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 10594296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
    Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
    Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
    J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
    Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S
    J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A chemical dataset for evaluation of alternative approaches to skin-sensitization testing.
    Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Kern PS; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Patlewicz GY; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):274-88. PubMed ID: 15209809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.
    Gerberick GF; Robinson MK; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA; Wright Z; Marks JG
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.
    Schneider K; Akkan Z
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation.
    Basketter DA; Gerberick F; Kimber I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 17627643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of BALB/c mouse in the local lymph node assay:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
    Hou F; Xing C; Li B; Cheng J; Chen W; Zhang M
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 72():53-8. PubMed ID: 25600862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The identification of photoallergic potential in the local lymph node assay.
    Scholes EW; Basketter DA; Lovell WW; Sarll AE; Pendlington RU
    Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 1991 Dec; 8(6):249-54. PubMed ID: 1823150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The local lymph node assay and skin sensitization testing.
    Kimber I; Dearman RJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 598():221-31. PubMed ID: 19967517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of ethanol:diethylphthalate as a vehicle for the local lymph node assay.
    Betts CJ; Beresford L; Dearman RJ; Lalko J; Api AP; Kimber I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Feb; 56(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 17244073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel.
    Dean JH; Twerdok LE; Tice RR; Sailstad DM; Hattan DG; Stokes WS
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 34(3):258-73. PubMed ID: 11754530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative analysis of skin sensitization potency of acrylates (methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and ethylhexyl acrylate) using the local lymph node assay.
    Dearman RJ; Betts CJ; Farr C; McLaughlin J; Berdasco N; Wiench K; Kimber I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Oct; 57(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 17868217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay.
    Jowsey IR; Clapp CJ; Safford B; Gibbons BT; Basketter DA
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18568891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry.
    Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA
    Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.