BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1068518)

  • 1. [Biophysical and ultrastructural aspects of an implant-bone interface].
    Baud CA
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1976 Sep; 86(9):941-5. PubMed ID: 1068518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Biomechanical apsects of implantation in bone].
    Rahn BA
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1976 Sep; 86(9):946-53. PubMed ID: 1068519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of surface chemistry on implant interface histology: a theoretical basis for implant materials selection.
    Clark AE; Hench LL; Paschall HA
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1976 Mar; 10(2):161-74. PubMed ID: 1254612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in ceramic-bone interface between surface-active ceramics and resorbable ceramics: a study by scanning and transmission electron microscopy.
    Neo M; Kotani S; Fujita Y; Nakamura T; Yamamuro T; Bando Y; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Feb; 26(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 1569117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biocompatibility of polysulfone composite materials for dental implant.
    Kuo YS
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1977 Sep; 24(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 269029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bioglass implant materials.
    Clark A
    J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 3470528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Shearing strength of the bone-implant bond--biomechanical and x-ray studies of bioglass ceramic and vitreous carbon implants].
    Thieme V; Hofmann H; Heiner H; Bertram G; Berger G; Findeisen B
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1983; 71(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 6222561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone-bonding behavior under load-bearing conditions of an alumina ceramic implant incorporating beads coated with glass-ceramic containing apatite and wollastonite.
    Li ZL; Kitsugi T; Yamamuro T; Chang YS; Senaha Y; Takagi H; Nakamura T; Oka M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Sep; 29(9):1081-8. PubMed ID: 8567706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The interface of calcium-phosphate and glass-ceramic in bone, a structural analysis.
    Gross UM; Müller-Mai CM; Voigt C
    Biomaterials; 1990 Jul; 11():83-5. PubMed ID: 2397266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Dental implants and their materials].
    Newesely H
    Naturwissenschaften; 1983 Jul; 70(7):324-31. PubMed ID: 6350895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A scanning electron microscopy study of the interface between ceramics and bone.
    Williams KR; Blayney AW; Frootko NJ; Ashton BA
    Biomaterials; 1985 Jul; 6(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 4052540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite element analysis of bone-adapted and bone-bonded endosseous implants.
    Rieger MR; Adams WK; Kinzel GL; Brose MO
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):436-40. PubMed ID: 2685245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The reaction between bioglass or biovitreous ceramics and rabbit tibia bone (author's transl)].
    Thieme V; Hofmann H; Heiner H; Berger G; Müller T; Zieger M
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1981; 69(8):707-18. PubMed ID: 6213115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro modeling of the bone/implant interface.
    Davies JE
    Anat Rec; 1996 Jun; 245(2):426-45. PubMed ID: 8769677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrical stimulation of bone growth into porous A12O3.
    Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Cleveland TW
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1976 Mar; 10(2):231-47. PubMed ID: 1254614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.
    Marco F; Milena F; Gianluca G; Vittoria O
    Micron; 2005; 36(7-8):630-44. PubMed ID: 16182543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [SEM findings in the implant interface after endosseous implantation of bio-sintered ceramics].
    Schubert R; Schubert U; Menniger H
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1986; 74(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 2939661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interface histology of rigid endosseous implants.
    Roberts EW; Poon LC; Smith RK
    J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(3):406-16. PubMed ID: 3470526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
    Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of ultrastructures of the interfaces between four kinds of surface-active ceramic and bone.
    Neo M; Kotani S; Nakamura T; Yamamuro T; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T; Bando Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Nov; 26(11):1419-32. PubMed ID: 1447227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.