BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10685481)

  • 1. Transverse-contour modeling of trunk muscle-distributed forces and spinal loads during lifting and twisting.
    Davis JR; Mirka GA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jan; 25(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 10685481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads during fatiguing repetitive trunk exertions.
    Sparto PJ; Parnianpour M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Dec; 23(23):2563-73. PubMed ID: 9854755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trunk muscle activities during asymmetric twisting motions.
    Marras WS; Davis KG; Granata KP
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 1998 Aug; 8(4):247-56. PubMed ID: 9779398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trunk muscle response to lifting unbalanced loads with and without knowledge of centre of mass.
    Meyers BM; Keir PJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Oct; 18(8):712-20. PubMed ID: 12957557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    J Biomech; 1995 Nov; 28(11):1309-17. PubMed ID: 8522544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of a lifting belt on spine moments and muscle recruitments after unexpected sudden loading.
    Lavender SA; Shakeel K; Andersson GB; Thomas JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jun; 25(12):1569-78. PubMed ID: 10851108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors in breathing maneuvers that affect trunk electromyogram during manual lifting.
    Kang SM; Lee YH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Oct; 27(19):2147-53. PubMed ID: 12394930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lumbar muscle activities in rapid three-dimensional pulling tasks.
    Thelen DG; Ashton-Miller JA; Schultz AB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Mar; 21(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 8852317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A functional subdivision of hip, abdominal, and back muscles during asymmetric lifting.
    Danneels LA; Vanderstraeten GG; Cambier DC; Witvrouw EE; Stevens VK; De Cuyper HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(6):E114-21. PubMed ID: 11246393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wrapping of trunk thoracic extensor muscles influences muscle forces and spinal loads in lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Bazrgari B
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Aug; 21(7):668-75. PubMed ID: 16678948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of trunk muscle coactivity on dynamic spinal loads.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Apr; 20(8):913-9. PubMed ID: 7644956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postural and trunk muscle response to sudden release during stoop lifting tasks before and after fatigue of the trunk erector muscles.
    Chow DH; Man JW; Holmes AD; Evans JH
    Ergonomics; 2004 May; 47(6):607-24. PubMed ID: 15204290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Muscle activity and low back loads under external shear and compressive loading.
    Callaghan JP; McGill SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 May; 20(9):992-8. PubMed ID: 7631247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electromyographic activity of the abdominal and low back musculature during the generation of isometric and dynamic axial trunk torque: implications for lumbar mechanics.
    McGill SM
    J Orthop Res; 1991 Jan; 9(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 1824571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An empirical approach to characterizing trunk muscle coactivation using simulation input modeling techniques.
    Mirka GA; Glasscock NF; Stanfield PM; Wilson JR
    J Biomech; 2000 Dec; 33(12):1701-4. PubMed ID: 11006396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interface stability influences torso muscle recruitment and spinal load during pushing tasks.
    Lee PJ; Granata KP
    Ergonomics; 2006 Feb; 49(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 16540437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The in vivo dynamic response of the human spine to rapid lateral bend perturbation: effects of preload and step input magnitude.
    Chiang J; Potvin JR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(13):1457-64. PubMed ID: 11458151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abdominal and erector spinae muscle activity during gait: the use of cluster analysis to identify patterns of activity.
    White SG; McNair PJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 Mar; 17(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 11937255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.