512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10685746)
1. Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographic findings.
Yeh TS; Jan YY; Tseng JH; Chiu CT; Chen TC; Hwang TL; Chen MF
Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Feb; 95(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 10685746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Navigator-triggered isotropic three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of malignant biliary obstructions: comparison with direct cholangiography.
Choi JY; Lee JM; Lee JY; Kim SH; Lee MW; Han JK; Choi BI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 18050328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [MR cholangiopancreatography: technique, indications and clinical results].
Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 1997 Dec; 94(6):632-41. PubMed ID: 9524602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of a new sequence of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography in thick cut and one shot acquisition].
Mougenel JL; Hudziak H; Ernst O; Dupas B; Lefevre F; Barraud H; Watelet J; Cezard O; Regent D; Bigard MA
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2000 Oct; 24(10):888-95. PubMed ID: 11084424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for locating hepatolithiasis and detecting accompanying biliary strictures.
Park DH; Kim MH; Lee SS; Lee SK; Kim KP; Han JM; Kim SY; Song MH; Seo DW; Kim AY; Kim TK; Min YI
Endoscopy; 2004 Nov; 36(11):987-92. PubMed ID: 15520917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [MRCP (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography)--an assessment of current status].
Merkle EM; Nüssle K; Glasbrenner B; Tomczak R; Preclik G; Rieber A; Adler G; Brambs HJ
Z Gastroenterol; 1998 Mar; 36(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 9577905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: MRI/MRCP in staging and treatment planning.
Masselli G; Gualdi G
Abdom Imaging; 2008; 33(4):444-51. PubMed ID: 17638040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography.
Alcaraz MJ; De la Morena EJ; Polo A; Ramos A; De la Cal MA; González Mandly A
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2000 Jul; 92(7):427-38. PubMed ID: 11026760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Obstructive diseases of the biliary tree: an imaging analysis of 76 cases].
Hu R; Xu YK; L GS
Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2002 Dec; 22(12):1101-3. PubMed ID: 12480584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic value of MRCP and indications for ERCP.
Sakai Y; Tsuyuguchi T; Tsuchiya S; Sugiyama H; Miyakawa K; Ebara M; Saisho H; Yokosuka O
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007 Dec; 54(80):2212-5. PubMed ID: 18265635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging of cholangiocarcinoma.
Manfredi R; Barbaro B; Masselli G; Vecchioli A; Marano P
Semin Liver Dis; 2004 May; 24(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 15192788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US.
Moon JH; Cho YD; Cha SW; Cheon YK; Ahn HC; Kim YS; Kim YS; Lee JS; Lee MS; Lee HK; Shim CS; Kim BS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 May; 100(5):1051-7. PubMed ID: 15842578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cholangiopancreatography with magnetic resonance. Clinical use of a new "inversion-recovery" sequence].
Liessi G; Cesari S; Dell'Antonio C; Avventi P; Spaliviero B; Butini R; Pavanello M
Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 8975311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Malignant biliary obstruction: value of imaging findings.
Stroszczynski C; Hunerbein M
Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(3):314-23. PubMed ID: 15965779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: findings at MRCP versus ERCP.
Park MS; Kim TK; Kim KW; Park SW; Lee JK; Kim JS; Lee JH; Kim KA; Kim AY; Kim PN; Lee MG; Ha HK
Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):234-40. PubMed ID: 15333766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative Evaluation of Malignant Perihilar Biliary Obstruction: Negative-Contrast CT Cholangiopancreatography and CT Angiography Versus MRCP and MR Angiography.
Wu XP; Ni JM; Zhang ZY; Lu FQ; Li B; Jin HH; Dai T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Oct; 205(4):780-8. PubMed ID: 26397326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance imaging including magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for tumor localization and therapy planning in malignant hilar obstructions.
Hänninen EL; Pech M; Jonas S; Ricke J; Thelen A; Langrehr J; Hintze R; Röttgen R; Denecke T; Winter L; Neuhaus P; Felix R
Acta Radiol; 2005 Aug; 46(5):462-70. PubMed ID: 16224919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
