These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10686004)

  • 1. A fully automated blood typing system for hospital transfusion services. ABS2000 Study Group.
    Sandler SG; Langeberg A; Avery N; Mintz PD
    Transfusion; 2000 Feb; 40(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 10686004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A solid phase and microtiter plate hemagglutination method for pretransfusion compatibility testing.
    Sandler SG; Langeberg A; Rumsey DH; Novak SC
    Haematologia (Budap); 2000; 30(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 11128107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An experience of the introduction of a blood bank automation system (Ortho AutoVue Innova) in a regional acute hospital.
    Cheng YW; Wilkinson JM
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2015 Aug; 53(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 25863409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of weak D with a fully automated solid-phase red cell adherence system.
    Lai M; Mavilia G; d'Onofrio G; Leone G
    Transfusion; 2005 May; 45(5):689-93. PubMed ID: 15847655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative Analysis of Clinical Samples Showing Weak Serum Reaction on AutoVue System Causing ABO Blood Typing Discrepancies.
    Jo SY; Lee JM; Kim HL; Sin KH; Lee HJ; Chang CL; Kim HH
    Ann Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(2):117-123. PubMed ID: 28028997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of an automated microplate technique in the Galileo system for ABO and Rh(D) blood grouping.
    Xu W; Wan F; Lou Y; Jin J; Mao W
    Clin Lab; 2014; 60(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 24660536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Erytra® fully automated analyser for Routine Use in Transfusion Laboratory.
    Chang C; Brown M; Davies L; Pointon L; Brown R; Barker D
    Transfus Med; 2014 Feb; 24(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 24188135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economic and workflow analysis of a blood bank automated system.
    Shin KH; Kim HH; Chang CL; Lee EY
    Ann Lab Med; 2013 Jul; 33(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 23826563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ABO and D typing and alloantibody screening in marrow samples: relevance to intraosseous blood transfusion.
    Bäckman S; Ångerman-Haasmaa S; Jousi M; Siitonen S; Salmela K
    Transfusion; 2018 Jun; 58(6):1372-1376. PubMed ID: 29492974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of two automated instruments for pre-transfusion testing: AutoVue Innova and Techno TwinStation.
    Shin SY; Kwon KC; Koo SH; Park JW; Ko CS; Song JH; Sung JY
    Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Jun; 28(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 18594174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated point-of-care testing for ABO agglutination test: proof of concept and validation.
    El Kenz H; Corazza F
    Vox Sang; 2015 Jul; 109(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 25766458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhanced detection of blood bank sample collection errors with a centralized patient database.
    MacIvor D; Triulzi DJ; Yazer MH
    Transfusion; 2009 Jan; 49(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 18798804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Donors' blood group declaration before donation can be used as a tool for electronic crossmatching.
    Arslan O
    Transfus Med; 2005 Dec; 15(6):487-92. PubMed ID: 16359420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An automatable format for accurate immunohematology testing by flow cytometry.
    Roback JD; Barclay S; Hillyer CD
    Transfusion; 2003 Jul; 43(7):918-27. PubMed ID: 12823752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrospective analysis of forward and reverse ABO typing discrepancies among patients and blood donors in a tertiary care hospital.
    Makroo RN; Kakkar B; Agrawal S; Chowdhry M; Prakash B; Karna P
    Transfus Med; 2019 Apr; 29(2):103-109. PubMed ID: 29327382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multicenter study on the performance of a fully automated, walk-away high-throughput analyzer for pretransfusion testing in the US population.
    Roback JD; Barclay S; Moulds JM; Denomme GA
    Transfusion; 2015 Jun; 55(6 Pt 2):1522-8. PubMed ID: 25753019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. North American pretransfusion testing practices, 2001-2004: results from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program survey data, 2001-2004.
    Shulman IA; Maffei LM; Downes KA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):984-9. PubMed ID: 16048410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of immunohematologic routine methods using the new erythrocyte-magnetized technology on the QWALYS 2 system.
    Schoenfeld H; Bulling K; von Heymann C; Neuner B; Kalus U; Kiesewetter H; Pruss A
    Transfusion; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1347-52. PubMed ID: 19389030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of a hospital-laboratory workstation for immunohematologic methods.
    Schoenfeld H; Pretzel KJ; von Heymann C; Neuner B; Kalus U; Kiesewetter H; Pruss A
    Transfusion; 2010 Jan; 50(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 19709392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experience with a cost-effective crossmatch protocol.
    Shulman IA; Nelson JM; Kent DR; Jacobs VL; Nakayama RK; Malone SA
    JAMA; 1985 Jul; 254(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 3999355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.