These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1068688)

  • 1. Variability of the nasion-subnasal, subnasalgnathion, and bizygomatic distances of individuals of 6, 7, 11, and 15 years of age and their importance in the determination of the vertical dimension.
    Domitti SS; Daruge E; Francisco da Cruz V
    Aust Dent J; 1976 Jun; 21(3):269-71. PubMed ID: 1068688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vertical facial growth: a longitudinal study from 7 to 14 years of age.
    van der Beek MC; Hoeksma JB; Prahl-Andersen B
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Jun; 13(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 1936138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regressive formula to determine vertical dimension in the edentulous.
    Domitti SS; Consani S
    Aust Dent J; 1978 Apr; 23(2):196-8. PubMed ID: 280300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vertical proportions of face: a cephalometric study.
    Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS; Sundrum KR
    Int J Orthod; 1991; 29(3-4):6-8. PubMed ID: 1802874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cephalometric analysis of dentofacial normals.
    Scheideman GB; Bell WH; Legan HL; Finn RA; Reisch JS
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Oct; 78(4):404-20. PubMed ID: 6933849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How does variation in lower anterior face height influence perceived attractiveness? A quantitative investigation.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    J Orthod; 2013 Sep; 40(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 24009320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Growth patterns of the face: a morphometric study.
    Farkas LG; Posnick JC; Hreczko TM
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Jul; 29(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 1643058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical measurement and evaluation of vertical dimension.
    Toolson LB; Smith DE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1982 Mar; 47(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 6950088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females.
    Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
    Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of the upper and lower vertical facial measurements of the Filipinos as it is used in the Willis method for determining the vertical dimension of occlusion.
    Tina-Olaivar EO; Olaivar OK
    J Philipp Dent Assoc; 1998; 50(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10202517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in facial dimensions assessed from lateral and frontal photographs. Part I--Methodology.
    Bishara SE; Jorgensen GJ; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Oct; 108(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 7572850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrospective evaluation of facial soft tissue cephalometric parameters in adolescents with normal occlusion.
    Poosti M; Ramezanzadeh B; Salehi T; Rashed R
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(2):15-8. PubMed ID: 20687311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults.
    Bozkir MG; Karakas P; Oguz O
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Jun; 26(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 14625792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do long-faced subjects really have a long anterior face? A longitudinal study.
    Ha Y; Park YS; Lee SP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):799-806. PubMed ID: 24880851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults.
    Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. McNamara norms for Turkish adolescents with balanced faces and normal occlusion.
    Kilic N; Catal G; Oktay H
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 20575197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of various facial and occlusal characteristics in mature individuals, with vertical and horizontal growth direction expressed at the chin.
    Lundström A; Woodside DG
    Eur J Orthod; 1981; 3(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 6945992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nasal breathing and the vertical dimension: A cephalometric study.
    El Aouame A; Daoui A; El Quars F
    Int Orthod; 2016 Dec; 14(4):491-502. PubMed ID: 27836765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Size and shape of soft-tissue facial profile: effects of age, gender, and skeletal class.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):498-504. PubMed ID: 9431467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.