These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10687403)

  • 1. A model of response time effects in symbolic comparison.
    Leth-Steensen C; Marley AA
    Psychol Rev; 2000 Jan; 107(1):62-100. PubMed ID: 10687403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semantic activation in action planning.
    Lindemann O; Stenneken P; van Schie HT; Bekkering H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):633-43. PubMed ID: 16822129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the symbolic distance effect in mental images constructed from verbal descriptions: a study of individual differences in the mental comparison of distances.
    Denis M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):197-210. PubMed ID: 17658445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A crossed random effects diffusion model for speeded semantic categorization decisions.
    Vandekerckhove J; Verheyen S; Tuerlinckx F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Mar; 133(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 19962683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Priming the access to names of famous faces.
    Schweinberger SR; Burton AM; Kelly SW
    Br J Psychol; 2001 May; 92(Pt 2):303-17. PubMed ID: 11417783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays.
    Smith PL; Ratcliff R; Wolfgang BJ
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1297-320. PubMed ID: 15066392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: the role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing.
    Parmentier FB
    Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):345-62. PubMed ID: 19007926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revisiting the picture-superiority effect in symbolic comparisons: do pictures provide privileged access?
    Amrhein PC; McDaniel MA; Waddill P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):843-57. PubMed ID: 12219794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors responsible for performance on the day-night task: response set or semantics?
    Simpson A; Riggs KJ
    Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):360-71. PubMed ID: 15985070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive flexibility and decision-making in a model of conditional visuomotor associations.
    Loh M; Deco G
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 22(11):2927-36. PubMed ID: 16324127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Category-related brain activity to natural categories is associated with the retrieval of visual features: Evidence from repetition effects during visual and functional judgments.
    Sim EJ; Kiefer M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):260-73. PubMed ID: 15993764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A dynamic context model of interactive behavior.
    Fu WT
    Cogn Sci; 2011 Jul; 35(5):874-904. PubMed ID: 21736603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for time-variant decision making.
    Ditterich J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 24(12):3628-41. PubMed ID: 17229111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural correlates of distance and congruity effects in a numerical Stroop task: an event-related fMRI study.
    Kaufmann L; Koppelstaetter F; Delazer M; Siedentopf C; Rhomberg P; Golaszewski S; Felber S; Ischebeck A
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):888-98. PubMed ID: 15808989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection.
    Smith PL; Ratcliff R
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Apr; 116(2):283-317. PubMed ID: 19348543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique.
    Perea M; Acha J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Feb; 130(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 19081083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of spatial congruity on audio-visual multimodal integration.
    Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Di Russo F; McDonald JJ; Hillyard SA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 17(9):1396-409. PubMed ID: 16197693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nature and facts about natural and artifactual categories: Sex differences in the semantic priming paradigm.
    Bermeitinger C; Wentura D; Frings C
    Brain Lang; 2008 Aug; 106(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 18442848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pupillary responses on the visual backward masking task reflect general cognitive ability.
    Verney SP; Granholm E; Marshall SP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Mar; 52(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 15003370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probability assessment with response times and confidence in perception and knowledge.
    Petrusic WM; Baranski JV
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Feb; 130(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 19081556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.