These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10687462)

  • 1. The use of indirect composite and ceramic inlays to restore anterior teeth: a clinical case report.
    Small BW
    Gen Dent; 1999; 47(4):364-6. PubMed ID: 10687462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ceramic inlays: a case presentation and lessons learned from the literature.
    Boushell LW; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 19368595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
    Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
    Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect-composite and ceramic inlay systems.
    Soares CJ; Martins LR; Pfeifer JM; Giannini M
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 15119713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ceromers used with indirect resins/ceramics: materials, clinical applications, and prep guidelines.
    Shannon A
    Dent Today; 1998 Mar; 17(3):60, 62, 64-5. PubMed ID: 9590960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bonded restorations for the prevention and treatment of the cracked-tooth syndrome.
    Geurtsen W; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):266-70. PubMed ID: 10850244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Ceramic inlays and onlays].
    van Pelt AW; de Kloet HJ; van der Kuy P
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):472-6. PubMed ID: 11921995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.
    Magne P; Belser UC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays.
    Manhart J; Chen HY; Neuerer P; Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A; Hickel R
    Am J Dent; 2001 Apr; 14(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 11507807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictability and aesthetics with nonmetal onlays.
    Ruiz JL; Nelson C; Bazan R
    Dent Today; 2007 Apr; 26(4):106, 108, 110. PubMed ID: 17486785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inlay restorations.
    Roulet JF; Degrange M
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):48-62. PubMed ID: 9120613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct inlay restorations: utilization of sonic preparation technology in conjunction with ceramic inserts.
    Koczarski MJ; Mitchell AL
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 19(9):555-60; quiz 561, 565. PubMed ID: 18038722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cerana--a direct ceramic inlay technique.
    Millar BJ
    Prim Dent Care; 1999 Apr; 6(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 11819882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictable esthetic indirect restorations.
    Ward DH
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2003 Aug; 24(8 Suppl):48-52; quiz 62. PubMed ID: 14692221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.