These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10687515)

  • 41. The influence of various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2006 Dec; 39(12):945-51. PubMed ID: 17107539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cyclic fatigue of endodontic nickel titanium rotary instruments: static and dynamic tests.
    Li UM; Lee BS; Shih CT; Lan WH; Lin CP
    J Endod; 2002 Jun; 28(6):448-51. PubMed ID: 12067126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Scanning electron microscope appearances of Lightspeed instruments used clinically: a pilot study.
    Marending M; Lutz F; Barbakow F
    Int Endod J; 1998 Jan; 31(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 9823130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Influence of multiple clinical use on fatigue resistance of ProTaper rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Vieira EP; França EC; Martins RC; Buono VT; Bahia MG
    Int Endod J; 2008 Feb; 41(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 18005043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture: a clinical practice assessment.
    Di Fiore PM; Genov KA; Komaroff E; Li Y; Lin L
    Int Endod J; 2006 Sep; 39(9):700-8. PubMed ID: 16916359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Cutting efficiency of five different types of rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Schäfer E; Oitzinger M
    J Endod; 2008 Feb; 34(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 18215681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The corrosive effects of sodium hypochlorite on nickel-titanium endodontic instruments: assessment by digital scanning microscope.
    Cavalleri G; Cantatore G; Costa A; Grillenzoni M; Comin Chiaramonti L; Gerosa R
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009 May; 58(5):225-31. PubMed ID: 19436252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of electrochemical polishing on the mechanical properties of K3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Barbosa FO; Gomes JA; de Araújo MC
    J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1533-6. PubMed ID: 19026889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A comparison of LightSpeed LS1 and LightSpeed LSX NiTi rotary instruments in apical transportation and length control in simulated root canals.
    Iqbal MK; Banfield B; Lavorini A; Bachstein B
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):268-71. PubMed ID: 17320711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluating two techniques on removal of fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an in vitro study.
    Alomairy KH
    J Endod; 2009 Apr; 35(4):559-62. PubMed ID: 19345805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Decrease in the fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use in curved root canals.
    Bahia MG; Buono VT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Aug; 100(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 16037784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of the surface characteristics of used and new ProTaper Instruments: an atomic force microscopy study.
    Inan U; Aydin C; Uzun O; Topuz O; Alacam T
    J Endod; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1334-7. PubMed ID: 17963958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of electropolishing ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instruments on cyclic fatigue resistance, torsional resistance, and cutting efficiency.
    Bui TB; Mitchell JC; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 2008 Feb; 34(2):190-3. PubMed ID: 18215679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
    Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Fracture resistance of electropolished rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
    Anderson ME; Price JW; Parashos P
    J Endod; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1212-6. PubMed ID: 17889692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: clinical cases.
    Ward JR; Parashos P; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2003 Nov; 29(11):764-7. PubMed ID: 14651286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.