These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10687651)

  • 1. Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a new synthetic polymer sheet wound dressing.
    Motta G; Dunham L; Dye T; Mentz J; O'Connell-Gifford E; Smith E
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Oct; 45(10):41, 44-6, 48-49. PubMed ID: 10687651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and economic benefit of enzymatic debridement of pressure ulcers compared to autolytic debridement with a hydrogel dressing.
    Waycaster C; Milne CT
    J Med Econ; 2013 Jul; 16(7):976-86. PubMed ID: 23701261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
    Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers.
    Seeley J; Jensen JL; Hutcherson J
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):39-44, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10655861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biofilm hydrogel dressing: a clinical evaluation in the treatment of pressure sores.
    Darkovich SL; Brown-Etris M; Spencer M
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1990; 29():47-60. PubMed ID: 2202317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of the effectiveness and cost of treatment with humid environment as compared to traditional cure. Clinical trial on primary care patients with venous leg ulcers and pressure ulcers].
    Capillas Pérez R; Cabré Aguilar V; Gil Colomé AM; Gaitano García A; Torra i Bou JE
    Rev Enferm; 2000 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 10788945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preliminary use of a hydrogel containing enzymes in the treatment of stage II and stage III pressure ulcers.
    Parnell LK; Ciufi B; Gokoo CF
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Aug; 51(8):50-60. PubMed ID: 16234576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.
    Colwell JC; Foreman MD; Trotter JP
    Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
    Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
    Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of Epi-Lock and saline dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcers.
    Kraft MR; Lawson L; Pohlmann B; Reid-Lokos C; Barder L
    Decubitus; 1993 Nov; 6(6):42-4, 46, 48. PubMed ID: 8286026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of 4 methods of debridement using a decision analysis methodology.
    Mosher BA; Cuddigan J; Thomas DR; Boudreau DM
    Adv Wound Care; 1999 Mar; 12(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 10326360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Managing sacral pressure ulcers with hydrocolloid dressings: results of a controlled, clinical study.
    Day A; Dombranski S; Farkas C; Foster C; Godin J; Moody M; Morrison M; Tamer C
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Mar; 41(2):52-4, 56, 58 passim. PubMed ID: 7598778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of a polymeric membrane dressing in the treatment of pressure ulcers.
    Carr RD; Lalagos DE
    Decubitus; 1990 Aug; 3(3):38-42. PubMed ID: 2205233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing clinical efficacy of a hydrocolloid/alginate dressing on full-thickness pressure ulcers.
    Barr JE; Day AL; Weaver VA; Taler GM
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Apr; 41(3):28-30, 32, 34-6 passim. PubMed ID: 7546113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.
    Payne WG; Posnett J; Alvarez O; Brown-Etris M; Jameson G; Wolcott R; Dharma H; Hartwell S; Ochs D
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Feb; 55(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19246785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of a normothermic dressing on pressure ulcer healing.
    Kloth LC; Berman JE; Dumit-Minkel S; Sutton CH; Papanek PE; Wurzel J
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 11074989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
    Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The clinical and cost effectiveness of externally applied negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of wounds in home healthcare Medicare patients.
    Philbeck TE; Whittington KT; Millsap MH; Briones RB; Wight DG; Schroeder WJ
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Nov; 45(11):41-50. PubMed ID: 10687657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.
    Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multi-center evaluation of a new wound dressing.
    Barr JE
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1993; 39(9):60-4, 66-7. PubMed ID: 8136005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.