311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10687651)
1. Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a new synthetic polymer sheet wound dressing.
Motta G; Dunham L; Dye T; Mentz J; O'Connell-Gifford E; Smith E
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Oct; 45(10):41, 44-6, 48-49. PubMed ID: 10687651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and economic benefit of enzymatic debridement of pressure ulcers compared to autolytic debridement with a hydrogel dressing.
Waycaster C; Milne CT
J Med Econ; 2013 Jul; 16(7):976-86. PubMed ID: 23701261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers.
Seeley J; Jensen JL; Hutcherson J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):39-44, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10655861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biofilm hydrogel dressing: a clinical evaluation in the treatment of pressure sores.
Darkovich SL; Brown-Etris M; Spencer M
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1990; 29():47-60. PubMed ID: 2202317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of the effectiveness and cost of treatment with humid environment as compared to traditional cure. Clinical trial on primary care patients with venous leg ulcers and pressure ulcers].
Capillas Pérez R; Cabré Aguilar V; Gil Colomé AM; Gaitano García A; Torra i Bou JE
Rev Enferm; 2000 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 10788945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preliminary use of a hydrogel containing enzymes in the treatment of stage II and stage III pressure ulcers.
Parnell LK; Ciufi B; Gokoo CF
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Aug; 51(8):50-60. PubMed ID: 16234576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.
Colwell JC; Foreman MD; Trotter JP
Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of Epi-Lock and saline dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcers.
Kraft MR; Lawson L; Pohlmann B; Reid-Lokos C; Barder L
Decubitus; 1993 Nov; 6(6):42-4, 46, 48. PubMed ID: 8286026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of 4 methods of debridement using a decision analysis methodology.
Mosher BA; Cuddigan J; Thomas DR; Boudreau DM
Adv Wound Care; 1999 Mar; 12(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 10326360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Managing sacral pressure ulcers with hydrocolloid dressings: results of a controlled, clinical study.
Day A; Dombranski S; Farkas C; Foster C; Godin J; Moody M; Morrison M; Tamer C
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Mar; 41(2):52-4, 56, 58 passim. PubMed ID: 7598778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of a polymeric membrane dressing in the treatment of pressure ulcers.
Carr RD; Lalagos DE
Decubitus; 1990 Aug; 3(3):38-42. PubMed ID: 2205233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing clinical efficacy of a hydrocolloid/alginate dressing on full-thickness pressure ulcers.
Barr JE; Day AL; Weaver VA; Taler GM
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Apr; 41(3):28-30, 32, 34-6 passim. PubMed ID: 7546113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.
Payne WG; Posnett J; Alvarez O; Brown-Etris M; Jameson G; Wolcott R; Dharma H; Hartwell S; Ochs D
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Feb; 55(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19246785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of a normothermic dressing on pressure ulcer healing.
Kloth LC; Berman JE; Dumit-Minkel S; Sutton CH; Papanek PE; Wurzel J
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 11074989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The clinical and cost effectiveness of externally applied negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of wounds in home healthcare Medicare patients.
Philbeck TE; Whittington KT; Millsap MH; Briones RB; Wight DG; Schroeder WJ
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Nov; 45(11):41-50. PubMed ID: 10687657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.
Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multi-center evaluation of a new wound dressing.
Barr JE
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1993; 39(9):60-4, 66-7. PubMed ID: 8136005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
