These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10687651)

  • 21. Clinical evaluation of hydrocolloid dressings for neurosurgical wounds.
    Fujimoto Y; Shimooka N; Ohnishi Y; Yoshimine T
    Surg Neurol; 2008 Aug; 70(2):217-20; discussion 220. PubMed ID: 18262632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acemannan hydrogel dressing versus saline dressing for pressure ulcers. A randomized, controlled trial.
    Thomas DR; Goode PS; LaMaster K; Tennyson T
    Adv Wound Care; 1998 Oct; 11(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 10326343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Management of chronic wounds with an innovative absorbent wound dressing.
    Meaume S; Perez J; Rethore V; Sebbane G; Dompmartin A; Bressieux JM; Leguyadec T; Tacca O; Bohbot S
    J Wound Care; 2012 Jul; 21(7):315-6, 318, 320-2. PubMed ID: 22886330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Experimental in vitro evaluation of the absorption capacity and control of exudate of 3 wound healing dressings].
    Torra i Bou JE; Cortés i Borra A; Manresa i Domínguez JM
    Rev Enferm; 1998 Oct; 21(242):suppl 2-8. PubMed ID: 10030154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. "Constant force technology" versus low-air-loss therapy in the treatment of pressure ulcers.
    Branom R; Rappl LM
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2001 Sep; 47(9):38-46. PubMed ID: 11889743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Randomized controlled trial of the absorbency of four dressings and their effects on the evaporation of burn wounds.
    Chen J; Han CM; Su GL; Tang ZJ; Su SJ; Lin XW
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Oct; 120(20):1788-91. PubMed ID: 18028772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diabetic foot ulcerations. A controlled, randomized comparison of two moist wound healing protocols: Carrasyn Hydrogel Wound dressing and wet-to-moist saline gauze.
    Jensen JL; Seeley J; Gillin B
    Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(7 Suppl):1-4. PubMed ID: 10326334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of an advanced wound dressing used in Iran.
    Kordestani S; Shahrezaee M; Tahmasebi MN; Hajimahmodi H; Haji Ghasemali D; Abyaneh MS
    J Wound Care; 2008 Jul; 17(7):323-7. PubMed ID: 18705234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simplifying modern wound management for nonprofessional caregivers.
    Seaman S; Herbster S; Muglia J; Murray M; Rick C
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Aug; 46(8):18-27. PubMed ID: 11189544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Moisture and healing: beyond the jargon.
    Bolton LL; Monte K; Pirone LA
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Jan; 46(1A Suppl):51S-62S; quiz 63S-64S. PubMed ID: 10732640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cost-effective managed care: gel versus wet-to-dry for debridement.
    Mulder GD
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Mar; 41(2):68-70, 72, 74 passim. PubMed ID: 7598779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical experience with an antimicrobial hydrogel dressing on recalcitrant wounds.
    Wood L; Wood Z; Davis P; Wilkins J
    J Wound Care; 2010 Jul; 19(7):287-8, 290-3. PubMed ID: 20616771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Early versus late initiation of negative pressure wound therapy: examining the impact on home care length of stay.
    Baharestani MM; Houliston-Otto DB; Barnes S
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2008 Nov; 54(11):48-53. PubMed ID: 19037137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A randomized controlled trial of larval therapy for the debridement of leg ulcers: results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open, observer blind, parallel group study.
    Mudge E; Price P; Walkley N; Harding KG
    Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 24299513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Xakellis GC; Chrischilles EA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 May; 73(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 1580775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparative study of wound dressings on full-thickness wounds in micropigs.
    Gokoo C; Burhop K
    Decubitus; 1993 Sep; 6(5):42-3, 46, 48 passim. PubMed ID: 8286020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Outcomes of venous ulcer care: results of a longitudinal study.
    Kerstein MD; Gahtan V
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Jun; 46(6):22-6, 28-9. PubMed ID: 11029932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A new hydrogel wound dressing for the treatment of open wounds. Gel-Syte wound care dressing evaluation.
    Fowler E; Papen JC
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1991; 37():39-45. PubMed ID: 1764158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effectiveness of a honey dressing for healing pressure ulcers.
    Yapucu Güneş U; Eşer I
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2007; 34(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 17413836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A prospective, open-label study to assess the clinical performance of a foam dressing in the management of chronic wounds.
    Zoellner P; Kapp H; Smola H
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 May; 52(5):34-6, 38, 40-2 passim. PubMed ID: 16687768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.