These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10687696)

  • 1. Reverberation time and maximum background-noise level for classrooms from a comparative study of speech intelligibility metrics.
    Bistafa SR; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):861-75. PubMed ID: 10687696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
    Yang W; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of noise and occupancy on optimal reverberation times for speech intelligibility in classrooms.
    Hodgson M; Nosal EM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Feb; 111(2):931-9. PubMed ID: 11863195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic conditions for speech communication in classrooms.
    Pekkarinen E; Viljanen V
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 1842300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a short-time speech-based intelligibility metric to the speech transmission index and intelligibility data.
    Payton KL; Shrestha M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3818-27. PubMed ID: 24180791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rating, ranking, and understanding acoustical quality in university classrooms.
    Hodgson M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):568-75. PubMed ID: 12186038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors Affecting Acoustics and Speech Intelligibility in the Operating Room: Size Matters.
    McNeer RR; Bennett CL; Horn DB; Dudaryk R
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Jun; 124(6):1978-1985. PubMed ID: 28525511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of type of early reflection, clarity of speech, reverberation and diffuse noise on the spatial perception of a speech source and its intelligibility.
    Prodi N; Pellegatti M; Visentin C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 May; 151(5):3522. PubMed ID: 35649908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effects of acaoustic adaptation of classrooms on the quality of verbal communication].
    Mikulski W
    Med Pr; 2013; 64(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 23829065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Objective Assessment of Binaural Benefit from Acoustical Treatment in Real Primary School Classrooms.
    Minelli G; Puglisi GE; Astolfi A; Hauth C; Warzybok A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 May; 20(10):. PubMed ID: 37239574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of the influence of reverberation on binaural speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet.
    Rennies J; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 22087928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms.
    Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Sep; 80(3):846-54. PubMed ID: 3760338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold.
    Roman N; Woodruff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23464040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Evaluation of Output Signal to Noise Ratio as a Predictor of Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility.
    Watkins GD; Swanson BA; Suaning GJ
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):958-968. PubMed ID: 29474218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auralization study of optimum reverberation times for speech intelligibility for normal and hearing-impaired listeners in classrooms with diffuse sound fields.
    Yang W; Hodgson M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):801-7. PubMed ID: 16938968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech intelligibility prediction in reverberation: Towards an integrated model of speech transmission, spatial unmasking, and binaural de-reverberation.
    Leclère T; Lavandier M; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3335-45. PubMed ID: 26093423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intelligibility of dysphonic speech in auralized classrooms.
    Bottalico P; Murgia S; Puglisi GE; Astolfi A; Ishikawa K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):2912. PubMed ID: 34717474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.