These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10687696)

  • 21. Effects of noise, reverberation and foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' performance of English speech comprehension.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2772. PubMed ID: 27250170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of noise and reverberation on speech intelligibility for cochlear implant recipients in realistic sound environments.
    Badajoz-Davila J; Buchholz JM; Van-Hoesel R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3538. PubMed ID: 32486825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
    Collin B; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prediction of binaural speech intelligibility against noise in rooms.
    Lavandier M; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):387-99. PubMed ID: 20058985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Subjective and objective speech intelligibility investigations in primary school classrooms.
    Astolfi A; Bottalico P; Barbato G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):247-57. PubMed ID: 22280588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of reverberation and noise on the intelligibility of sentences in cases of presbyacusis.
    Duquesnoy AJ; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Aug; 68(2):537-44. PubMed ID: 7419810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Room acoustics for the aged.
    Plomp R; Duquesnoy AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Dec; 68(6):1616-21. PubMed ID: 7462459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of classroom acoustics on the speech intelligibility of students.
    Rabelo AT; Santos JN; Oliveira RC; Magalhães Mde C
    Codas; 2014; 26(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 25388068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of classroom amplification on the signal-to-noise ratio in classrooms while class is in session.
    Larsen JB; Blair JC
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2008 Oct; 39(4):451-60. PubMed ID: 18820087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Aircraft noise and speech intelligibility in an outdoor living space.
    Alvarsson JJ; Nordström H; Lundén P; Nilsson ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3455-62. PubMed ID: 24907809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The intelligibility of speech in elementary school classrooms.
    Bradley JS; Sato H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2078-86. PubMed ID: 18397015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of masks on speech intelligibility in auralized classrooms.
    Bottalico P; Murgia S; Puglisi GE; Astolfi A; Kirk KI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Nov; 148(5):2878. PubMed ID: 33261397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A survey of acoustic conditions in semi-open plan classrooms in the United Kingdom.
    Greenland EE; Shield BM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1399-410. PubMed ID: 21895081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A multi-resolution envelope-power based model for speech intelligibility.
    Jørgensen S; Ewert SD; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):436-46. PubMed ID: 23862819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On the combined effects of signal-to-noise ratio and room acoustics on speech intelligibility.
    Bradley JS; Reich RD; Norcross SG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):1820-8. PubMed ID: 10530010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of the division between early and late reflections on intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech.
    Li J; Xia R; Fang Q; Li A; Pan J; Yan Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2801-10. PubMed ID: 25994708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Payton KL; Uchanski RM; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An intrusive method for estimating speech intelligibility from noisy and distorted signals.
    Mamun N; Zilany MSA; Hansen JHL; Davies-Venn EE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Sep; 150(3):1762. PubMed ID: 34598625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.