These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10687709)

  • 1. The recognition of isolated words and words in sentences: individual variability in the use of sentence context.
    Grant KW; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):1000-11. PubMed ID: 10687709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Carhart Memorial Lecture, American Auditory Society, Salt Lake City, Utah 1996. Phoneme and word recognition for words in isolation and in sentences.
    Olsen WO; Van Tasell DJ; Speaks CE
    Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):175-88. PubMed ID: 9201453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship of Grammatical Context on Children's Recognition of s/z-Inflected Words.
    Spratford M; McLean HH; McCreery R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):799-809. PubMed ID: 28972469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of contextual information on the perception of speech by postlingually and prelingually profoundly hearing-impaired Hebrew-speaking adolescents and adults.
    Most T; Adi-Bensaid L
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):252-63. PubMed ID: 11409860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Hoover BM; Lewis DE; Kortekaas RW; Pittman AL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 43(4):902-14. PubMed ID: 11386477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration.
    Grant KW; Walden BE; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2677-90. PubMed ID: 9604361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Mackersie CL; Prida TL; Stiles D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Feb; 44(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 11218102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Large-corpus phoneme and word recognition and the generality of lexical context in CVC word perception.
    Gelfand JT; Christie RE; Gelfand SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 57(1):297-307. PubMed ID: 24687475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lexical effects on spoken-word recognition in children with normal hearing.
    Krull V; Choi S; Kirk KI; Prusick L; French B
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):102-14. PubMed ID: 19701087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relations among different measures of speech reception in subjects using a cochlear implant.
    Rabinowitz WM; Eddington DK; Delhorne LA; Cuneo PA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1869-81. PubMed ID: 1401531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative Weighting of Semantic and Syntactic Cues in Native and Non-Native Listeners' Recognition of English Sentences.
    Shi LF; Koenig LL
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):424-33. PubMed ID: 26783854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition of lexically controlled words and sentences by children with normal hearing and children with cochlear implants.
    Eisenberg LS; Martinez AS; Holowecky SR; Pogorelsky S
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):450-62. PubMed ID: 12411778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measures of auditory-visual integration in nonsense syllables and sentences.
    Grant KW; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2438-50. PubMed ID: 10491705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring effectiveness of semantic cues in degraded English sentences in non-native listeners.
    Shi LF
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 24003982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Production of sentence-final intonation contours by hearing-impaired children.
    Allen GD; Arndorfer PM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Apr; 43(2):441-55. PubMed ID: 10757695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hearing Aids Benefit Recognition of Words in Emotional Speech but Not Emotion Identification.
    Goy H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Singh G; Russo FA
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518801736. PubMed ID: 30249171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.