BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10687910)

  • 1. Comparison of two techniques of patient-controlled sedation with midazolam.
    Rodrigo MR; Fung SC
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Dec; 37(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 10687910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of midazolam and midazolam with remifentanil for patient-controlled sedation during operations on third molars.
    Garip H; Gürkan Y; Toker K; Göker K
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 45(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 16930785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved sedation for oral surgery by combining nitrous oxide and intravenous Midazolam: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Venchard GR; Thomson PJ; Boys R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jun; 35(6):522-7. PubMed ID: 16442264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of transmucosal midazolam with inhalation sedation for dental extractions in children. A randomized, cross-over, clinical trial.
    Wilson KE; Welbury RR; Girdler NM
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Sep; 51(8):1062-7. PubMed ID: 17697301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of recovery in patients undergoing intravenous conscious sedation using bispectral analysis.
    Sandler NA; Hodges J; Sabino M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 59(6):603-11; discussion 611-2. PubMed ID: 11381378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in outpatient third molar surgery.
    Ustün Y; Gündüz M; Erdoğan O; Benlidayi ME
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 64(9):1353-8. PubMed ID: 16916668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A partially blinded randomised controlled trial of patient-maintained propofol sedation and operator controlled midazolam sedation in third molar extractions.
    Leitch JA; Anderson K; Gambhir S; Millar K; Robb ND; McHugh S; Kenny GN
    Anaesthesia; 2004 Sep; 59(9):853-60. PubMed ID: 15310346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of oral midazolam and nitrous oxide sedation for dental extractions in children.
    Wilson KE; Girdler NM; Welbury RR
    Anaesthesia; 2006 Dec; 61(12):1138-44. PubMed ID: 17090232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study to assess the value of bispectral analysis in intravenous sedation with midazolam during third molar surgery under local anaesthesia.
    Cheung CW; Irwin MG; Chiu WK; Ying CL
    Anaesthesia; 2008 Dec; 63(12):1302-8. PubMed ID: 19032297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient-maintained sedation for oral surgery using a target-controlled infusion of propofol - a pilot study.
    Leitch JA; Sutcliffe N; Kenny GN
    Br Dent J; 2003 Jan; 194(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 12540939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of patient-controlled remifentanil application in third molar surgery.
    Esen E; Ustün Y; Balcioğlu YO; Alparslan ZN
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 63(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 15789316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the effects of midazolam/fentanyl and midazolam/tramadol for conscious intravenous sedation during third molar extraction.
    Göktay O; Satilmiş T; Garip H; Gönül O; Göker K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jun; 69(6):1594-9. PubMed ID: 21277062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of 1- and 3-minute lockout periods during patient-controlled sedation with midazolam.
    Rodrigo C; Chow KC
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Apr; 53(4):406-10; discussion 410-1. PubMed ID: 7699494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of patient-controlled apparatus for sedation in the emergency department.
    Kekeç Z; Akin A; Kilinç S; Sözüer EM
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2005 Nov; 72(6):385-8. PubMed ID: 16358163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of midazolam intravenous sedated patient's comfort degree in mandibular third molar surgery].
    Wan K; Jing Q; Liu DY; Zhao JZ; Chen X; Dong YL
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 42(9):568-9. PubMed ID: 18070439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation in third molar surgery.
    Cheung CW; Ying CL; Chiu WK; Wong GT; Ng KF; Irwin MG
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Nov; 62(11):1132-8. PubMed ID: 17924894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for conscious sedation in dental surgery monitored by bispectral index.
    Fan TW; Ti LK; Islam I
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 51(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 23058230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The dosage of sedative was reduced by patient-controlled sedation during epidural anesthesia].
    Tsunoda K
    Masui; 1995 Jan; 44(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 7699828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of flumazenil on the recovery from intravenous midazolam.
    Hunter KM; Zacharias M; Parkinson R; Luyk NH
    N Z Dent J; 1994 Mar; 90(399):9-12. PubMed ID: 8190388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inhaled methoxyflurane (Penthrox) sedation for third molar extraction: a comparison to nitrous oxide sedation.
    Abdullah WA; Sheta SA; Nooh NS
    Aust Dent J; 2011 Sep; 56(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 21884146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.