198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10688094)
1. Acucise endopyelotomy.
Nakada SY
Urology; 2000 Feb; 55(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 10688094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acucise endopyelotomy: evolution of a less-invasive technology.
Nakada SY; Pearle MS; Clayman RV
J Endourol; 1996 Apr; 10(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8728678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrograde endopyelotomy: a comparison between laser and Acucise balloon cutting catheter.
el-Nahas AR
Curr Urol Rep; 2007 Mar; 8(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 17303017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ureteral access sheath facilitates inspection of incision of ureteropelvic junction.
Auge BK; Wu NZ; Pietrow PK; Delvecchio FC; Preminger GM
J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):1070-3. PubMed ID: 12576848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A pediatric case of ureteropelvic junction obstruction treated with retrograde endopyelotomy.
Umekawa T; Ishikawa Y; Kajikawa H; Iguchi M; Kurita T
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1996 Nov; 42(11):895-8. PubMed ID: 8973943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty.
Baldwin DD; Dunbar JA; Wells N; McDougall EM
J Endourol; 2003 Apr; 17(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12803987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction treated with retrograde endopyelotomy.
Bolton DM; Bogaert GA; Mevorach RA; Kogan BA; Stoller ML
Urology; 1994 Oct; 44(4):609-13. PubMed ID: 7941208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction.
Brooks JD; Kavoussi LR; Preminger GM; Schuessler WW; Moore RG
Urology; 1995 Dec; 46(6):791-5. PubMed ID: 7502417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effective treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a decision tree analysis.
Gettman M; Lotan Y; Roerhborn CG; Cadeddu JA; Pearle MS
J Urol; 2003 Jan; 169(1):228-32. PubMed ID: 12478142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endopyelotomy and endoureterotomy with the acucise ureteral cutting balloon device: preliminary experience.
Chandhoke PS; Clayman RV; Stone AM; McDougall EM; Buelna T; Hilal N; Chang M; Stegwell MJ
J Endourol; 1993 Feb; 7(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 8481721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of acucise endopyelotomy and endoballoon rupture for management of secondary proximal ureteral stricture in the porcine model.
Nakada SY; Soble JJ; Gardner SM; Wolf JS; Figenshau RS; Pearle MS; Humphrey PA; Clayman RV
J Endourol; 1996 Aug; 10(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 8872726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrograde acucise endopyelotomy: is it worth its cost?
Sofras F; Livadas K; Alivizatos G; Deliveliotis Ch; Albanis S; Melekos M; Christoforidis K
J Endourol; 2004 Jun; 18(5):466-8. PubMed ID: 15253822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complications of acucise endopyelotomy.
Kim FJ; Herrell SD; Jahoda AE; Albala DM
J Endourol; 1998 Oct; 12(5):433-6. PubMed ID: 9847065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acucise endopyelotomy in a porcine model: procedure standardization and analysis of safety and immediate efficacy.
Andreoni C; Srougi M; Ortiz V; Clayman RV
Int Braz J Urol; 2004; 30(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 15707519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endopyelotomy review.
Bernardo N; Smith AD
Arch Esp Urol; 1999 Jun; 52(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 10427896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endopyelotomy: patient selection, results, and complications.
Gerber GS; Lyon ES
Urology; 1994 Jan; 43(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 8284881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Endopyelotomy with ureteral cutting balloon device: long-term follow up of 13 patients].
Umekawa T; Iguchi M; Amasaki N; Yamate T; Konya E; Kurita T
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Aug; 90(8):713-7. PubMed ID: 10487047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Percutaneous endopyelotomy.
Bernardo NO; Smith AD
Urology; 2000 Aug; 56(2):322-7. PubMed ID: 10925105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution.
Dimarco DS; Gettman MT; McGee SM; Chow GK; Leroy AJ; Slezak J; Patterson DE; Segura JW
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):707-12. PubMed ID: 17094743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acucise endopyelotomy: assessment of long-term durability.
Nadler RB; Rao GS; Pearle MS; Nakada SY; Clayman RV
J Urol; 1996 Sep; 156(3):1094-7; discussion 1097-8. PubMed ID: 8709315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
